caribny posted:Zed posted:What part of what Jagdeo said did you diisagree with? State it then there can be a sensible discussion, if you can hold off cussing.
I keep hearing about the expectation of massive profits for the shareholders but from what I am reading, that statement is a stretch. Maybe someone has the actual figures since the bridge has been in operation and can share it so the discussion can be evidence-based.
If the bridge is currently profitable then why do the owners want a pay increase? Why did the owners ensure that the bridge had absolutely no legal competitors?
The deal was a bad one from the beginning and even a Jagdeo lover like Baseman agrees.
Hey hey...I agree with facts and reason. That's why I also, at times, agree with the PNC...and sometimes even you, but don't sit to comfortable!!