Skip to main content

Reply to "Granger remains non-committal on date for dissolution of Parliament"

Django posted:
Demerara_Guy posted:
Django posted:

DG , you shooting blanks !!!

Perhaps, you can show clearly which applies --

-- Article 106, subsections (6) & (7), or ..

-- Article 61 plus specific part(s) ..

when a government is defeated by a non-confidence vote in parliament.

What you are saying ,government falls by CM  vote, Parliament dissolve on the same day of vote , and elections kicks in . If it's such as claimed , why the clamor for dissolution of parliament.

You certainly don't have a clue how a country runs or comprehend Guyana Constitution .No time to waste with you further.

HInt: When Elections are called and during any time within 3 months ,an emergency occurred ,what happens ?

Bai, the Guyanese government don't have a history of doing anything when 'emergencies' occur in Guyana so your question which is parroting Granger's statement is meaningless. Floods, fires, strikes, crimes happen and the government continues to sleep. What exactly is the kind of emergency that Parliament would need to convene for?

Anyone with even an iota of decency will have no trouble agreeing that Granger is currently violating the laws and constitution of Guyana.

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×