Skip to main content

Reply to "Granger remains non-committal on date for dissolution of Parliament"

Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Demerara_Guy posted:
Django posted:

DG , you shooting blanks !!!

Perhaps, you can show clearly which applies --

-- Article 106, subsections (6) & (7), or ..

-- Article 61 plus specific part(s) ..

when a government is defeated by a non-confidence vote in parliament.

Gud Gud, lets see his rebuttal. Interesting to see his explanation how the government is complying with the constitution. 

Cant wait to see Djanjo rebuttal. 

Dave posted:

Eh Eh, is weh Djanjo  gone. 

Must be getting his life line Basil wille on the phone .. let’s see . 

You need to avoid being a jerk.

Is that all you can come up with. 

Why the goading ??

Why do you fell that way, my apologies if you fell offended.

But your own analysis may help me/ us , maybe we are wrong in our opinion of the constitution, just help us understand in your own words.. that’s all man . 

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×