Django posted:"Democracy means different things to different people"
I found an interesting article read here
Look, guy, reading a bundle of your posts I conclude that when you're cornered you behave not like a frightened rat but a sly smartass rat. You resort to prevaricating, equivocating, shilly-shallying, sidestepping, evading, beating around the bush etc.
But Gilbakka will beat you with your own stick, namely, that "interesting article" you recommend to me. Here is a quote from it: "I already mentioned Iraq. Take a look at the democracy there. Yes, it means free elections and an outcome that represents the will of the majority. But that’s where the similarity between American democracy and Iraqi democracy ends. Here at home, democracy means that within a few weeks of the election, the winner has the loser over to the house for white turkey chili. In Iraq, the winner — the majority’s choice — does what he can to silence the losers — the minority — maybe to crush them, and in response, the losers set off bombs to obstruct the winner’s governance."
Now, applying the American-style democracy to Guyana, did the winner David Granger invite the loser Donald Ramotar to his house for white turkey chili or duck curry or chinese fried rice? NO. Instead, Granger seems to be applying the Iraqi formula to crush the losing PPP. Is that the kinda democracy you want? Yes or No? Don't resort to poooosy-foooting.