ronan posted:Drugb posted:ronan posted:that's actually NOT the "premise of the article" . . . but you are simply too dunce to recognize this
further, your shakeabattie aside, what exactly does "contribute to the nation" mean for an army not (yet) at war outside y'all Roger Khan drug murdering 'security' consensus?
We ain't playing dodge ball here. Answer the question, what has the GDF been contributing to the nation that warrants their current level of funding? Given that the GDF is comprised primarily of PNC supporters, one can surmise that the organization is merely a vehicle for rewarding PNC supporters for their loyalty. They don't fight any war or provide any security to the nation. In fact the last time they were in action at Jonestown, they duck for cover instead of protecting the US congress man. Not to mention Buxton during the PPP reign where they were supporting the freedom fighters rather than protect the Guyanese public.
your post is the shakeabatty of an idle confounded DUNCE, unworthy of a response
sorry
Actually Shakeabatty, Druggy has a point. I do agree with a well funded military in principle however, this said military sat back and watched the slaughter of mostly Indians by their/your kith and kin terrorists gangs which were headed by ex-GDF members.
The then Govt complained about the lack of cooperation from the disciplined forces to help stem the violence. The PPP was forced to raise a 3rd force to regain stability.
So Shakeabatty, what do you view as the value proposition for maintaining a robust military, apart from Maduro?