Reply to "From the horses mouth"

Former Member

According to Mr Ramotar, Article 161 (2) was "coined" during the PPP regime to include the Opposition Leader in the equation for consensus sake and to remove the unilateral presidential power to appoint a GECOM chairman. So, since a PPP President agreed to Article 161 (2), how can Django argue that the PPP thought it would rule forever? I think Granger has blatantly removed from the equation the Opposition Leader provision. THAT is authoritarian.

10/22/189:18 AM

<ul id="{%=id%}ButtonGroup" class="button-group h-popup-buttons even-button-group even-1">
    <li id="{%=id%}Okay_buttonContainer"><a id="{%=id%}Okay" href="javascript:void(0);" class="button success no-margin-bottom h-alert-modal-ok-button" role="button">OK</a><script type="text/javascript">
        (function() {
            function {%=id%}Okay_click(event, data) {
            {%=id%}Popup.hide();
        }
        
                $('#{%=id%}Okay').on('click', {%=id%}Okay_click);
        })();
    </script></li></ul><a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close-reveal-modal" aria-label="Close Modal">&#215;</a><div class="last-modal-focus focus-utility-element" tabindex="0"></div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
        (function() {
            {%=id%}Popup = new SS.Popup.ModalPopup('{%=id%}');
        })();
    </script>

Skip to main content

Membership Required

Remove From Your Block List

Manage Follow Preferences

Block

Premium Membership Required

GNI VIP Member

Please wait...