Reply to "For the Dunce Lawyers of Guyana - take note !!!!"

skeldon_man posted:

Django posted:

skeldon_man posted:

Django posted:

skeldon_man posted:

Django posted:

skeldon_man posted:

28 years of the PNC and an empty treasury. The PPP might not be saints, but the PNC are not saints or even altar boys either. Ask David Patterson how come the $9000.00 from the Chinese Consortium ended up in his personal bank account.

I have never condoned the actions of Burnham and the PNC , when elections was rigged, the botched Nationalization of Industries. I knew a day will come to get rid of them.

By the way David Patterson gave an explanation regarding the funds transferred to his personal account, which was refunded to the agency that cover the initial cost. Let the Auditor General prove otherwise, instead accused him of stealing.

Django Bhai, de man tief and get ketch. Now if dem nah bin ketch de man, he would be laffin all de way to the dance hall to wine down and sport.

WHY AND HOW THE MONEY ENDED UP IN HIS PERSONAL ACCOUNT?

Like he bin jess kum out fram canje mad house. Dis look like wan gin kaak bring ram goat story hey.

That was discussed here , what happen you missed it ? as mentioned let the Auditor General proved money was pilfered.

Bai, all I am asking is how $9000.00 US ended up in the man's personal account. Yes, I must have missed it when I was gone.

Click on link

https://www.stabroeknews.com/2...ng-china-conference/

Some one old tief man get better excuses than this.

The Auditor General announced his intention of auditing a Chinese company depositing US$9000 into the private account of Minister David Patterson. Minister Patterson now insists there was nothing sinister in that deposit, it was not a bribe and not in any way related to any corruption. The Minister’s justification for a US$9000 deposit in his personal account in 2017 by a Chinese company was just a refund for a meeting the Chinese company invited him to attend in early 2016. Minister Patterson insists he used money from the Maritime Administration Department (MARAD), an agency under his Ministry, and that when he was refunded in 2017, a year later, he refunded the money to MARAD.
Minister Patterson tried desperately to deflect the truth when he demanded that people be charged for exposing information in his personal account. Patterson was a lead voice once for whistleblowers. Now that he is in the shoe, he wants people charged. But this deflection will not make the corrupt perception disappear. Why was a refund only given almost a year after Minister Patterson attended the meeting in Macao? Did he receive Cabinet approval to use money from MARAD? Who at MARAD approved such use and what evidence is there to show the money ever left Minister Patterson’s account and returned to MARAD’s account?