Dave posted:Baseman posted:Dave posted:Poor Royston, he will be the sacrificial lamb for PNC . He should take some schooling from Irfat and Robert how to thief and leave no trace .
Look at you, the man (Irfaan) has been charged but not yet even tried or convicted and you concluded he stole and left no trace.
Second nonsense, if he did steal and left no trace, then how come SOCU came with evidence to charge him? Or are you saying they just do so to do so?
Neither of your (implied) assertions make any sense!
Now, why do you conclude that this Royston guy is a sacrific lamb when he has not yet been charged and tried? Who is he a sacrificial lamb for, what are they hiding behind??
Every Guyanese knows how some politicians gain their wealth. If Irfaan and others can prove their assets were from salary or loans to build their lavish lifestyle, good for them.
I am not aware Irfaan has a business.As a former minister, if your name is mentioned in allegations, declare how you achieve your fortune and shut everyone up, that’s the right way.
Royston - the sacrificial lamb. Granger had the opportunity to appoint his own people as commissioner, who would have slap Royston on the risk. Royston on the other hand, had cheque’s written in his name.
https://www.kaieteurnewsonline...ale-of-govt-reserve/
No one is stupid why Justice Kennard was chosen.
My comment is one of principle, not prejudice. Both Irfaan and Royston are entitled to due process and an assumption of innocence!
If you know something, you ought to provide the information to SOCU! Clearly, you have concluded and they see they need to prove their case!