Drugb posted:antabanta posted:From where did you get this information about standards of the ombudsman's report? It seems that every accusation against the Rat is biased despite overwhelming evidence and common knowledge. But of course you are an objective observer.
Surprise surprise, not!!!
First you hold up an ombudsman's report as evidence. Now you are asking me to prove that it is not evidence, a slippery worm you are, but you can not fool anyone with your evasive maneuvers.
The ombudsman's only opines as to whether a charge is justified or not. It cannot be used as evidence in a court of law to convict an accused.
What??? As said before, the ombudsman conducted an objective investigation based on the evidence. Bear in mind, the managers of NBS were cleared of any wrongdoing long before the ombudsman got involved, long before the government changed hands. It seems that every accusation against the Rat is biased despite overwhelming evidence and common knowledge. But of course you are an objective observer.