Skip to main content

Reply to "Counsel Excellence Dazzell issues PUBLIC legal Opinion to Bibi Shadick attacking GECOM's position on a matter that is sub judice . . . what kind of lawyer is this?"

Stormborn posted:
ronan posted:

Freedom House oil money politricks by AMBUSH

preserving the FRAUDULENT voters list remains Jagdeo's bottom line . . . always has been

'Charandass' Ver. 2.0

PPP dark arts affiliates doin work . . . Pope London in clover!

We cannot accept the absurd statistic that the list is some 33 percent in error. If it is it also does not mean it is fraudulent. It simply means it was not kept up as is required by law. We are supposed to have routine purging and continuous registration ( or so I was led to believe). The list can be out of kelter with census data if people emigrated or died. THere is also always some over lap since 16 years old can register. 

A prudent system would use the same list in the house to house registering. The person doing the register would be aided if they went to a home and recited who is supposed to be living there and check the answer. Often it would be the same since Guyanese do not move often even in urban centers. This would quicken the registration process. 

And Charrandas did absolutely nothing wrong if you look at it procedurally. It is what the constitution was interpreted to do until the recent reinterpretation to make the President king. Floor crossing was allowed and NCV did not need prior notification to "establish the legislator intends to vote against the list". That is abject nonsense. If that interpretation is allowed to stay; bye by any vestigial claim we have on democracy and welcome a de facto ethnic based  dictatorship.

i am not here to waste time re-litigating what is blazingly obvious to all sane about the PPP's tenacious, malign plotting and 'investments' (material and otherwise) on this matter except those most alienated for whatever reason(s)

other than a lame appeal to process, the case against house-to-house is laughably weak and, more to the point . . . desperate

why have you chosen not to address the legal malpractice of this (former?) cult member?

FM
Last edited by Former Member
×
×
×
×
×
×