caribny posted:Stormborn posted:
This fellow said "Therefore, CARICOM countries, other than The Bahamas and Montserrat, but including Guyana, are legally bound to grant CARICOM nationals the right to remain for a period of six months, provided they are not a security risk and they can demonstrate the ability not to become a charge upon the State during their stay. In principle, this right applies to Haitian nationals as well."
They are refugees, Guyana has 40 percent poverty, why and how they will not become a burden on the state? Barbados learnt its lesson from visa free passage. Guyana will soon...
I se you still suffer from Mad Jagdeo disease. So racist you are that you cannot see Haitians outside of the perspective of being some impoverished refugee.
1. They are NOT staying in Guyana so are NOT refugees. In fact Haitians are more highly regarded in French Guyana than are the Guyanese who also illegally attempt to live there!
2. When they reach their destinations they will WORK. They don't want handouts.
In fact I suggest that you tell those Central Americans that they can learn a thing or two from Haitians. When Obama blocked Haitians from entry into the USA to get TPS they found work and some eventualy set up businesses in Tijuana and other Mexican cities. Not lie on the ground and weep like those Central Americans. As bad as Honduras and Guatemala might be Haiti is WORSE. Maybe because of this and the fact that they are black Haitians don't aggressively demand that any nation must accept them because they are poor, or their country lawless. They try to do the best that they can.
If a black Haitian, who doesn't speak Spanish and who is culturally alien in Mexico can figure out how to survive there or in Chile than a Guatemalan can.
The USA CANNOT solve all the problems of the world! And Obama who deported more immigrants than Trump has yet to do, proved this. It is only in 2015 and 2016 that Obama deported fewer people then Trump did last year!
Btw those kids in cages and foil blankets in freeing buildings began under Obama. People need to learn to be honest.
They are refugees as we are from our home and a term you often use here at your convenience. I do not know why the term offends you to the level you attribute to is implications outside its scope and insist one could only use the word if they are afflicted with some terrible brain disease. Were you symptomatic of the same when you use it with respect to us leaving?
Who is saying the US should solve the world's problem. I am saying that in that respect we are crippled and have been so by incompetent politicians for over half a century. We cannot help ourselves and do not have the resources to reach some 40 percent of our people so why offer help with no resources?
I do not care to be distracted by other issues. I am speaking of our personal problems.