Django posted:Dave posted:Django posted:Dave posted:Django posted:Dave posted:It’s written in black and white , is only them “FOOLS “ in government and GNI trying to rewrite the judgement.
Delivering her judgment, the Chief Justice said that the language used by the CCJ in its June 18 decision made it “…evident that the effect of the NCM was the immediate resignation of Cabinet, but the Court clearly state that notwithstanding this, the tenure in office of the Cabinet, including the President, as well as Government as a whole, “is on a different footing” – is that of a caretaker mode consequent to the passage of the said NCM.”
The basis of the Chief Justice’s decision was that the issue was a live one before the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), which pronounced on the matter. In those circumstance, she said, a court of first instance, which she sat as, is bound to that decision by the principle of precedent. Consequently, and since Nandlall was a party to those proceedings, the application was dismissed as wholly misconceived, vexatious, and an absolute abuse of process.
Delivering her judgment, the Chief Justice said that the language used by the CCJ in its June 18 decision made it “…evident that the effect of the NCM was the immediate resignation of Cabinet, but the Court clearly stated that notwithstanding this, the tenure in office of the Cabinet, including the President, as well as Government as a whole, “is on a different footing” – is that of a caretaker mode consequent to the passage of the said NCM.”
The Chief Justice further said that in these circumstances “there could not have been, and cannot be any requirement for a mandatory order compelling Cabinet including the Government to give effect to the resignation of the Cabinet, including the President…”
You don't pick and choose, that's for low level thinkers, read again!!!
I am now convinced you are the low level thinker. You should asked questions if a comment is difficult for you to understand.
sometimes it better to shut up than expose your ignorance, then you look like a bigger fool.
I quote the CJ remarks as a reference of how the illegal government is abusing the constitution...I did not edit or add to what she said.The government is required by the constitution to call election after 3 months of the NCM.
Nonsense , everyone knows what the CJ said , how many times the same old repeating. Election date is called is it not ? you jumped in trying to back up the mistake of your com-padre. Try reading what you wrote before hitting the enter key , sounds like kindergartner.
You all like hawks ready for the kill, doesn't take much to accept a mistake. Any way the world judging ayuh.
You are a dummy. I quote the CJ remarks to show there was no need to go to a court and asked the jackass dictator government to resign, when she quote the decision of the CCJ date of June 18. The constitution should follow immediately. Section 106, subsections (6) & (7), Guyana Constitution on the procedure for a successful no confidence vote in parliament.
I saw everyone trying to explain the constitution to you , but ayo brain dead hence its so difficult.
Anyhow, I am done with further discussion on this topic. Either ayo ignorant or ayo playing stupid to frustrate everyone what the constitution say.
Another piece of tripe , as expected from low level thinkers , your post says it.
Have a great day !!!!
lol