Reply to "CHARRANDAS seeks parliamentary sitting postponement at CCJ"

Former Member

ksazma posted:
Banna, stick to your favorite lolo and bt obsession. The doors of Parliament are not padlocked so the 33 Coalition fools are not blocked from going there. My argument was about whether going there had any substantive value given that the requisite quorum needed to pass any bill is more than the 33 voters that Coalition has. The Coalition desparately needs some PPP MPs to vote NO in order for their 33 YES votes to matter. It seems like your lolo and bt obsession is blurring your vision. The morning too early for your lolo and bt nastiness.

4/26/1912:20 PM

<ul id="{%=id%}ButtonGroup" class="button-group h-popup-buttons even-button-group even-1">
    <li id="{%=id%}Okay_buttonContainer"><a id="{%=id%}Okay" href="javascript:void(0);" class="button success no-margin-bottom h-alert-modal-ok-button" role="button">OK</a><script type="text/javascript">
        (function() {
            function {%=id%}Okay_click(event, data) {
            {%=id%}Popup.hide();
        }
        
                $('#{%=id%}Okay').on('click', {%=id%}Okay_click);
        })();
    </script></li></ul><a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close-reveal-modal" aria-label="Close Modal">&#215;</a><div class="last-modal-focus focus-utility-element" tabindex="0"></div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
        (function() {
            {%=id%}Popup = new SS.Popup.ModalPopup('{%=id%}');
        })();
    </script>

Skip to main content

Membership Required

Remove From Your Block List

Manage Follow Preferences

Block

Premium Membership Required

GNI VIP Member

Please wait...