Skip to main content

Reply to "AFC executive pushes for fired sugar workers to be charged (for not sending their children to school)."

kp posted:

This jackass is looking for business, the PPP paid for his law degree he should know better.

 Laid off workers whose severance was $500,000 or less will receive full settlement, workers whose settlement is let's $600,000 will only get $300,000 and the other half at the end of the year and who knows? they may not get the balance. Errol is living off the taxpayers, he is there posing in a Rum shop and talking PNC politics, let them charge the unemployed people, what good that be, they don't have money to eat much less to pay a fine so lock them up. Good move PNC soup drinker.

 Errol wants to be relevant, AFC is no longer a third party.

The 1950's was no better than now. Then Indians saw the benefits of educating their children especially girls whom the previously kept at home. Any reversion to that era of pre 50's backwardness where the Indian child is increasingly illiterate would seriously set back growth in indian society. This trend of keeping children at home or sending out to be bread earners is atrocious. It is not poverty that is doing it but pure laziness. It should not be seen as political to advocate against this attitude. Is should be the default condition. Every child should get a base education and it should be the operating paradigm of every parent.

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×