Skip to main content

Reply to "786,552"

@Rochelle posted:

 

It stands to reason that Mr. Lowenfield's numbers are far more legitimate than figures PPP so depends upon on the basis of a bloated list of 661k eligible voters. 

If this is indeed a fight for transparence and democracy, care to explain why PPP/C was abhorrently against conducting house-to-house registrations? 

For Lowenfield numbers to have any legitimacy at all he has to establish the source of his numbers. So far he has not done so. Everyone was witness to the numbers shown below so until they are challenged in an Election court via an elections petition, those are the official legitimate numbers.

Secondly, the H2H exercise was not objected to because it would have created a cleaner list. The PPP objected to it solely because they viewed it as yet another effort by the Coalition to further delay the elections as well as an effort to disenfranchise valid voters. After-all they, like Lowenfield clearly stated in 2015 believe that it is impossible for dead people as well as people not presently at the polling places to vote. The ink stain on voters' fingers alone last for about a week.

The current certified record shows that about 70% of eligible voters voted on March 2, 2020 and more of those voted for the PPP/C than the Coalition. That is the record. Everything else is as the Caricom Observers stated, "fishing expeditions".

Please note also that the certified tabulation below also states VALID VOTES so no need for further confusion there.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
FM
Last edited by Former Member
×
×
×
×
×
×