@BGMAN posted:Let me repeat what I said before. Every statistic after the 2012 Census are only estimates. People migrate permanently, study abroad and work temporarily abroad. In order to do any meaningful statistical modelling, you have to minimize the use of assumptions and estimates. Also, for most of the Guyanese living abroad whose names are on the voters list, their names will remain on the voters list because when they die abroad, GECOM is not notified of their death.
As Lowenefield himself stated in 2015, it is highly impossible for anyone to impersonate another person and vote.
Long Live Democracy.
If every statistic after the 2012 census are only estimates, than it stands to reason any election numbers to follow depend on the law of averages, the very averages Jagdeo and PPP/C fought hard to maintain instead of starting from a clean slate to conduct house-to-house registrations.
I provided for you actual figures from both official census numbers and registered voters. Using the same "law of averages" there is NO WAY you or others can prove that over 80% of Guyanese were eligible to vote in the 2020 elections, when, on average, close to half the Guyanese population of 19 years of age or younger.
It stands to reason that Mr. Lowenfield's numbers are far more legitimate than figures PPP so depends upon on the basis of a bloated list of 661k eligible voters.
If this is indeed a fight for transparence and democracy, care to explain why PPP/C was abhorrently against conducting house-to-house registrations?