Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Word on the street is not favourable to APNU-AFC Coalition

May 14, 2016 | By | Filed Under Letters 

Dear Editor,

I was in Barbados in the late 80’s when they were experiencing a massive financial problem. The IMF was knocking at their door and the Erskine Sandiford government had to retrench loads of public servants to stave off a dollar devaluation. In the mid 90’s I was at University in Trinidad when the Patrick Manning administration was facing their financial meltdown. During Manning was questioned about his involvement with Dole Chadee, a suspected drug king pin. I was living in Michigan during 2007-2009 financial meltdown associated with the USA housing market. Many persons were being sent home and businesses were closing. People were losing their homes and the American stock market was in a free fall.
Editor, in none of those cases did I observe what I am observing now that Guyana is facing its own financial crisis.  Everywhere I turn, the remarks are consistent, as though rehearsed: “Let the drugs flow.” It is believed that prior to May 2015, Guyana had a parallel economy. Many attribute the large buildings, the influx of automobiles and the huge developmental expansions, to the drug under world. It is believed that this new administration is hampering the drug trade.
Ask most Guyanese and they all have a story as to the affordability of many of those massive structures – finished and stalled – that dot the skyline of Georgetown. It is a public secret that most Guyanese think that the funding of those edifices were only possible through ill-gotten gains. But now that things are financially tightening in Guyana, there are those who are clamoring for things to go back to the days “when the drugs were flowing.”
And what is very telling about the clarion calls for a return to the “old days”, is that the calls are also coming from religious people. There are practicing church, mosque and temple goers who are saying that Guyana needs a financial shot in the arm, and that if drugs is what it takes, then “let it flow!”
When I hear those remarks I cringe, for it is obvious that those calling for the “drugs to flow” do not understand the magnitude of the horrors that drugs cause. Drugs turn women into prostitutes and men into junkies. Drugs eat away at one’s brain cells and retard you for life. Drugs create a violent culture where many of its victims are viciously murdered. Drugs negatively affect the academic performances of huge portions of some communities.
However, when these facts are highlighted, the common remark is that the drugs are only flowing through Guyana. The notion is that it is shipped out to other developed countries and the responsibility is on them. The destruction that those countries face as a result of the drug trade seems not to bother those wishing for the return of “old days”. And when it is highlighted that Guyana has not been spared, as is obvious from our ever-growing ‘junkie’ population, the flippant response is that, “they are only collateral damage”.
I work with the homeless and the addicts, many of whom are parents.  Those who trivialize the effects of drugs would talk differently if they were ever to be subjected to its ravenous effects. When once you get hocked, it is almost impossible to redeem your life! The resultant effects are the devastation and destruction of the affected family.
Indeed it would be unfair to lay the dire economic situation squarely on the door-steps of this administration. A cursory observation of Guyana’s current plight would show that sugar is dead; rice took a hit from the failed petro caribe Venezuelan deal, gold prices are taking a beating and the protracted dry spell was a nightmare for both our natural resources and farming. In other words, the economic realities facing Guyana was predestined to happen, no matter who had won the 2015 elections.
However, these facts do not resonate with the masses. Perception is reality and the perception is that Guyana had a parallel economy of drug money before 2015 and things were rolling along. Now the government has changed and they feel that the country has all but grinded to a halt. Having said that, I would like to be a fly on the wall of the Granger administration’s Cabinet meetings. I would really like to know what they discuss in their war-room. What plans do they have for the kick starting of the Guyana economy? It seems like no one other that the insiders seem to know what plans are in train for the development of this country.
The Granger administration has four solid years to pull something out of their hat that will significantly stimulate this economy.  And they had better reveal it soon because the word on the street is, come 2020, even some of those who like the coalition will hold their nose and vote their pocket books. Even some religious people.
Pastor Wendell P. Jeffrey
Practical Christianity Ministries

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Mr.T posted:

Why is the pastor advocating the return of the drugs trade?

Perhaps he doesn't have any confidence that the Coalition government can/will generate any other economic activities. 

FM

There wouldn't any economic benefits from the mass confusion on May 26th as the president is hoping for. The PPP said it, the Guyanese people said it, I said it, and the experts agreed. This as an opportunity to squander the taxpayers money lavishly. They already raping the contingencies fund.

FM

"Ask most Guyanese and they all have a story as to the affordability of many of those massive structures – finished and stalled – that dot the skyline of Georgetown. It is a public secret that most Guyanese think that the funding of those edifices were only possible through ill-gotten gains. But now that things are financially tightening in Guyana, there are those who are clamoring for things to go back to the days “when the drugs were flowing.”
And what is very telling about the clarion calls for a return to the “old days”, is that the calls are also coming from religious people. There are practicing church, mosque and temple goers who are saying that Guyana needs a financial shot in the arm, and that if drugs is what it takes, then “let it flow!”
When I hear those remarks I cringe, for it is obvious that those calling for the “drugs to flow” do not understand the magnitude of the horrors that drugs cause. Drugs turn women into prostitutes and men into junkies. Drugs eat away at one’s brain cells and retard you for life. Drugs create a violent culture where many of its victims are viciously murdered. Drugs negatively affect the academic performances of huge portions of some communities."


 

These religious people prefer the money flow from the drug trade,without considering the effects on the human population,what kind of people are these they are certainly not godly,they are a bunch of crooks who worships material gains.

Django
asj posted:

Word on the street is not favourable to APNU-AFC Coalition

May 14, 2016 | By | Filed Under Letters 

Dear Editor,


Ask most Guyanese and they all have a story as to the affordability of many of those massive structures – finished and stalled – that dot the skyline of Georgetown. It is a public secret that most Guyanese think that the funding of those edifices were only possible through ill-gotten gains.


When I hear those remarks I cringe, for it is obvious that those calling for the “drugs to flow” do not understand the magnitude of the horrors that drugs cause. Drugs turn women into prostitutes and men into junkies. Drugs eat away at one’s brain cells and retard you for life. Drugs create a violent culture where many of its victims are viciously murdered. Drugs negatively affect the academic performances of huge portions of some communities.
 Pastor Wendell P. Jeffrey
Practical Christianity Ministries

Don't see any evidence that this man is calling for the return of the drug trade.

Do see evidence that most Guyanese perceived that economic activity under the PPP came, not from the official economy, but from the drug trade.'

Is this what baseman and druggie scream, as evidence that the PPP did a good job?

I have asked both of them for a description of what exactly the PPP did that was so good.

Baseman descends into hysterical screams, implying that I am a fervent APNU supporter, even though he conceded that he noticed that I called them corrupt dunces.

Druggie cries that we shouldn't talk about the PPP, and Jagdeo, even though he loves to wail about a jumble who died 31 years ago.

NEITHER of them can outline any policies that the PPP undertook, that APNU isn't.

In fact poor Druggie, with his feeble mind, even claims that APNU is copying what the PPP did.  Yet, he claims that they are destroying Guyana.

Well clearly he contradicts himself, as he is basically saying that the PPP was destroying Guyana, and APNU is merely continuing this.

FM
Cobra posted:

There wouldn't any economic benefits from the mass confusion on May 26th as the president is hoping for. The PPP said it, the Guyanese people said it, I said it, and the experts agreed.

And yet had the PPP won, there would have been a massive squandermania.  Huge events at the Provident Stadium with expensive Bollywood acts flown in.

Had APNU objected, you would have called them cry babies, and told them to stop being divisive.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×