Skip to main content

Prashad posted:

I think the cow products are different in Hinduism. Cow milk is used in religious services not water buffalo milk. Cow dung is used as fuel instead of wood. Cow dung is used as fertilizer. Cow milk has less fat than water buffalo milk. Water buffalo can be very moody animals. So there is a difference.

but, is the beef considered acceptable to eat for Hindus?

Is any meat suppose to be eaten by Hindus?

AJ

At one time, Indians in Guyana celebrated India Independence day. With marches, wearing Nehru caps and singing the Indian national anthem, including  prayer at the Mandirs.

When did this practice stop and why ?

Even though a division of races took place in Guyana, this would have been a good culture event for Indians, as our link to India.

The British took away our Indian language and most of our culture. But did  an Indian government in Guyana tried to restore it ?  

Tola
Abu Jihad posted:
Prashad posted:

I think the cow products are different in Hinduism. Cow milk is used in religious services not water buffalo milk. Cow dung is used as fuel instead of wood. Cow dung is used as fertilizer. Cow milk has less fat than water buffalo milk. Water buffalo can be very moody animals. So there is a difference.

but, is the beef considered acceptable to eat for Hindus?

Is any meat suppose to be eaten by Hindus?

There is no Hindu ban on water buffalo meat consumption in India but North Indian state legislatures prohibit all beef slaughter but any Hindu who eats meat can have his water buffalo stake and eat it too.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
Prashad posted:
Abu Jihad posted:
Prashad posted:

I think the cow products are different in Hinduism. Cow milk is used in religious services not water buffalo milk. Cow dung is used as fuel instead of wood. Cow dung is used as fertilizer. Cow milk has less fat than water buffalo milk. Water buffalo can be very moody animals. So there is a difference.

but, is the beef considered acceptable to eat for Hindus?

Is any meat suppose to be eaten by Hindus?

There is no Hindu ban on water buffalo meat consumption in India but North Indian state legislatures prohibit all beef slaughter but any Hindu who eats meat can have his water buffalo stake and eat it too.

Hindus are not supposed to eat any form of flesh...they should be strict vegetarians. ?????

FM
skeldon_man posted:
Prashad posted:
Abu Jihad posted:
Prashad posted:

I think the cow products are different in Hinduism. Cow milk is used in religious services not water buffalo milk. Cow dung is used as fuel instead of wood. Cow dung is used as fertilizer. Cow milk has less fat than water buffalo milk. Water buffalo can be very moody animals. So there is a difference.

but, is the beef considered acceptable to eat for Hindus?

Is any meat suppose to be eaten by Hindus?told yo that PandiReepu 

There is no Hindu ban on water buffalo meat consumption in India but North Indian state legislatures prohibit all beef slaughter but any Hindu who eats meat can have his water buffalo stake and eat it too.

Hindus are not supposed to eat any form of flesh...they should be strict vegetarians. ?????

Who told you that Pandit Reepu.

Prashad
Prashad posted:

India exports water buffalo meat to Burma. I am not an expert on Hinduism but I don't think that there is anything in Hindu scripture to ban water buffalo meat.

The word COW refers to mature females of many different mammals. For example, seals, cattle, buffalo etc. Both "cows" (cattle) and water buffalo are of the same biological family Bovidae. So for all intents and purposes, they are the same. Anyone seeking to use the literal distinctions as an excuse to eat beef is a hypocrite. An Indian here said he can eat beef as long as it isn't an Indian cow.

GTAngler

There is a difference in Hindu animal slaughter to that of Islam and Jews kosher slaughter. The Hindus are supposed to say prayers before the slaughter then kill the animals with one single strike thereby ensuring instant death. I don't think that there are anything Hindu butcher shops in Guyana. It is indeed very shameful.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
Tola posted:

At one time, Indians in Guyana celebrated India Independence day. With marches, wearing Nehru caps and singing the Indian national anthem, including  prayer at the Mandirs.

When did this practice stop and why ?

Even though a division of races took place in Guyana, this would have been a good culture event for Indians, as our link to India.

The British took away our Indian language and most of our culture. But did  an Indian government in Guyana tried to restore it ?  

I disagree. I see no reason for Guyanese en masse in Guyana to be celebrating another country's independence. Besides, most indoGuyanese spew nothing but diatribe during Guyana's own independence celebrations.

A

Hindu pandits of Guyana should be ashamed of themselves. They have stood by and watch the Hindu population become Christians. Where are the Hindu Keffers of Guyana?  Where are the Hindu chiefs of Guyana? 

Prashad
Prashad posted:

Cow dung is used as fuel instead of wood. 

Prash, I watched a video somewhere showing an Indian village woman cooking at her fireside. She placed dried cow-down cakes into the already heated fireside to produce more heat . Then, without washing her hands, she made a set of roti/chapatti. I think that's insanitary.

Photo shows a woman preparing to light her stove with cow-patties/dung:

Image result for indian woman cooking with cow patties

 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Gilbakka posted:
Prashad posted:

Cow dung is used as fuel instead of wood. 

Prash, I watched a video somewhere showing an Indian village woman cooking at her fireside. She placed dried cow-down cakes into the already heated fireside to produce more heat . Then, without washing her hands, she made a set of roti/chapatti. I think that's insanitary.

Photo shows a woman preparing to light her stove with cow-patties/dung:

Image result for indian woman cooking with cow patties

 

That is why in India there is always outbreak of bellyworks. That is why also that keffer is always in a grumpy mood. It is all about the street food he eats in India from people who don't wash their hands.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
Mitwah posted:
skeldon_man posted:

Hindus are not supposed to eat any form of flesh...they should be strict vegetarians. ?????

This is false. I have dealt with this question here already.

That is to show how much I know about Hinduism. So how come the pandits in Guyana "pretend" not to eat fish and meat?

FM
skeldon_man posted:
Mitwah posted:
skeldon_man posted:

Hindus are not supposed to eat any form of flesh...they should be strict vegetarians. ?????

This is false. I have dealt with this question here already.

That is to show how much I know about Hinduism. So how come the pandits in Guyana "pretend" not to eat fish and meat?

This tread is about India's Independence and the slaughter of Hindus as the Greatest Holocaust. Yogi is a Brahmin, perhaps he can answer. 

Mitwah
Mitwah posted:
skeldon_man posted:
Mitwah posted:
skeldon_man posted:

Hindus are not supposed to eat any form of flesh...they should be strict vegetarians. ?????

This is false. I have dealt with this question here already.

That is to show how much I know about Hinduism. So how come the pandits in Guyana "pretend" not to eat fish and meat?

This tread is about India's Independence and the slaughter of Hindus as the Greatest Holocaust. Yogi is a Brahmin, perhaps he can answer. 

So now India's independence day is past and gone, the thread should be closed? Come in Yuji!!!

FM
skeldon_man posted:
Mitwah posted:
skeldon_man posted:
Mitwah posted:
skeldon_man posted:

Hindus are not supposed to eat any form of flesh...they should be strict vegetarians. ?????

This is false. I have dealt with this question here already.

That is to show how much I know about Hinduism. So how come the pandits in Guyana "pretend" not to eat fish and meat?

This tread is about India's Independence and the slaughter of Hindus as the Greatest Holocaust. Yogi is a Brahmin, perhaps he can answer. 

So now India's independence day is past and gone, the thread should be closed? Come in Yuji!!!

Yugly is a Brahmin. He gonna answer yuh question about dem Pundits.

Mitwah
Prashad posted:

Those Hindus who do not go to temples or have anything to do with Hinduism but still regard themselves as Hindu.

Secular means non-religious. Hinduism is a religion. I understand some Hindus claim to be secular but aren't the two mutually exclusive?

A

Secular Hindus of Guyana are people who are ashamed of being Hindus because the Artificial Englishman West Indian culture looks down upon them as inferior but they cannot bring themselves to leaving Hinduism and becoming Christians.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
Prashad posted:

Secular Hindus in Guyana are people who are ashamed of being Hindus because the Artificial Englishman West Indian culture looks down upon them as inferior but they cannot bring themselves to leaving Hinduism and becoming Christians.

Maybe they just not religious like people who belong to other religions are not religious....who are you to judge others?

FM
Prashad posted:

Secular Hindus in Guyana are people who are ashamed of being Hindus because the Artificial Englishman West Indian culture looks down upon them as inferior but they cannot bring themselves to leaving Hinduism and becoming Christians.

There is no such thing as "secular Hindu". Either you are a Hindu or not. So you are saying that you got rid of your inferiority by being relabled?

Mitwah

I don't follow any religion. I like parts of all religions. But I do recognize that Hinduism is the religion of our Dravidian and Indo Aryan ancestors. It is ours to the core and no one can tell us otherwise

 

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
Prashad posted:

I don't follow any religion. I like parts of all religions. But I do recognize that Hinduism is the religion of our Dravidian and Indo Aryan ancestors. It is ours to the core.

Then you are secular to the core.

Mitwah
Prashad posted:

Secular Hindus of Guyana are people who are ashamed of being Hindus because the Artificial Englishman West Indian culture looks down upon them as inferior but they cannot bring themselves to leaving Hinduism and becoming Christians.

I know what you're talking about and agree in part. Many IndoGuyanese have accepted the brainwashing to be ashamed of their Indianness. Many converted to Christianity for the same reason. But that has nothing to do with secularism which by definition is non-religious.

A

I believe if you convert to Christianity then change your name to a Christian name like Winston Benjamin but don't call yourself Beharry or Luckoo for example when you are no longer a Hindu 

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
Prashad posted:

I believe if you convert to Christianity then change your name to a Christian name like Winston Benjamin but don't call yourself Beharry for example when you are no longer a Hindu 

Why?

A
Prashad posted:

I believe if you convert to Christianity then change your name to a Christian name like Winston Benjamin but don't call yourself Beharry or Luckoo for example when you are no longer a Hindu 

I have always believed that religion comes from within regardless of what you're born into or call yourself. The Canadian Mission Church was notorious for forcing people to convert if they wanted jobs. I know many who converted. Some in name and some who became more "religious" than the Canadian Church itself and milked it for whatever they could. What if you had a family to support, converting nominally was your only option AND you maintained your beliefs?

GTAngler
Prashad posted:

Secular Hindus of Guyana are people who are ashamed of being Hindus because the Artificial Englishman West Indian culture looks down upon them as inferior but they cannot bring themselves to leaving Hinduism and becoming Christians.

So, if I was born a Hindu and don't practise Hinduism or believe in any religion, I am a secular Hindu?

FM
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:

You are no longer a Hindu. It is not your name anymore.

Says who? Is there an authority that decides what name a person HAS to use?

Okay then why don't you call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism and see if you would not get a fatwa on your head.

Prashad
skeldon_man posted:
Prashad posted:

Secular Hindus of Guyana are people who are ashamed of being Hindus because the Artificial Englishman West Indian culture looks down upon them as inferior but they cannot bring themselves to leaving Hinduism and becoming Christians.

So, if I was born a Hindu and don't practise Hinduism or believe in any religion, I am a secular Hindu?

You are a secular Hindu as long as you do not convert to another religion.

Prashad
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:

You are no longer a Hindu. It is not your name anymore.

Says who? Is there an authority that decides what name a person HAS to use?

Okay then why don't you call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism and see if you would not get a fatwa on your head.

That's your rationale? If people don't comply with your demand to change their names, you will put a fatwa on their heads?

A
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:

You are no longer a Hindu. It is not your name anymore.

Says who? Is there an authority that decides what name a person HAS to use?

Okay then why don't you call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism and see if you would not get a fatwa on your head.

That's your rationale? If people don't comply with your demand to change their names, you will put a fatwa on their heads?

It is not about me putting a fatwa on their heads. They should do the right thing and change their names to reflect the new reality of the new religion that they have adopted.  You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

Prashad

Many Hindu men will be pissed off now. They marry Muslim and Jewish girls but in order to marry these Abrahamic girls they have to convert. But they prefer to hide behind the Hindu name to fool people that they have not converted when in reality they did.

Prashad
Prashad posted:
skeldon_man posted:
Prashad posted:

Secular Hindus of Guyana are people who are ashamed of being Hindus because the Artificial Englishman West Indian culture looks down upon them as inferior but they cannot bring themselves to leaving Hinduism and becoming Christians.

So, if I was born a Hindu and don't practise Hinduism or believe in any religion, I am a secular Hindu?

You are a secular Hindu as long as you do not convert to another religion.

I prefer to be labeled as a secular Hindu before you call me an Arab Dry Goods Salesman. Whew!! I can now stop stressing.
Does being married to a Christian woman change that secular Hindu label?

FM
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:

You are no longer a Hindu. It is not your name anymore.

Says who? Is there an authority that decides what name a person HAS to use?

Okay then why don't you call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism and see if you would not get a fatwa on your head.

That's your rationale? If people don't comply with your demand to change their names, you will put a fatwa on their heads?

It is not about me putting a fatwa on their heads. They should do the right thing and change their names to reflect the new reality of the new religion that they have adopted.  You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

Who decided that that is the right thing to do? What does a name have to do with which god you worship? Do Muslim, Hindu, and Christian Gods recognize their devotees by name?

A
Mitwah posted:

Prashad, Dilip Kumar is a Muslim. I can name you a few more.

Dilip Kumar is not his legal name. It is just his stage name. His real name is Mohammad Yusuf Khan and he never converted to Hinduism.

Prashad
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:

You are no longer a Hindu. It is not your name anymore.

Says who? Is there an authority that decides what name a person HAS to use?

Okay then why don't you call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism and see if you would not get a fatwa on your head.

That's your rationale? If people don't comply with your demand to change their names, you will put a fatwa on their heads?

It is not about me putting a fatwa on their heads. They should do the right thing and change their names to reflect the new reality of the new religion that they have adopted.  You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

Who decided that that is the right thing to do? What does a name have to do with which god you worship? Do Muslim, Hindu, and Christian Gods recognize their devotees by name?

As I said before call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism in Kashmir and see what happens.

Prashad
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:

You are no longer a Hindu. It is not your name anymore.

Says who? Is there an authority that decides what name a person HAS to use?

Okay then why don't you call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism and see if you would not get a fatwa on your head.

That's your rationale? If people don't comply with your demand to change their names, you will put a fatwa on their heads?

It is not about me putting a fatwa on their heads. They should do the right thing and change their names to reflect the new reality of the new religion that they have adopted.  You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

Who decided that that is the right thing to do? What does a name have to do with which god you worship? Do Muslim, Hindu, and Christian Gods recognize their devotees by name?

As I said before call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism in Kashmir and see what happens.

I guess that means my questions blew holes in your argument.

A
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:

You are no longer a Hindu. It is not your name anymore.

Says who? Is there an authority that decides what name a person HAS to use?

Okay then why don't you call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism and see if you would not get a fatwa on your head.

That's your rationale? If people don't comply with your demand to change their names, you will put a fatwa on their heads?

It is not about me putting a fatwa on their heads. They should do the right thing and change their names to reflect the new reality of the new religion that they have adopted.  You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

Who decided that that is the right thing to do? What does a name have to do with which god you worship? Do Muslim, Hindu, and Christian Gods recognize their devotees by name?

As I said before call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism in Kashmir and see what happens.

I guess that means my questions blew holes in your argument.

I think you got it back to front. If you call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism in Kashmir then them fellows will blow holes in you.

Prashad
Prashad posted:
Mitwah posted:

Prashad, Dilip Kumar is a Muslim. I can name you a few more.

Dilip Kumar is not his legal name. It is just his stage name. His real name is Mohammad Yusuf Khan and he never converted to Hinduism.

Sharukh performs Ganesh Pooja every morning. And then there is that Muslim Dharmendra. 

Mitwah

Sharukh Khan and A.P.J. Abdul Kalam does not fit into Prashad's argument because both men claim to be Hindu and Muslim.  Both would go to Ashrams and Mosques. No Pandit or Imam will tell those two men to leave.

 

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:
antabanta posted:
Prashad posted:

You are no longer a Hindu. It is not your name anymore.

Says who? Is there an authority that decides what name a person HAS to use?

Okay then why don't you call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism and see if you would not get a fatwa on your head.

That's your rationale? If people don't comply with your demand to change their names, you will put a fatwa on their heads?

It is not about me putting a fatwa on their heads. They should do the right thing and change their names to reflect the new reality of the new religion that they have adopted.  You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

Who decided that that is the right thing to do? What does a name have to do with which god you worship? Do Muslim, Hindu, and Christian Gods recognize their devotees by name?

As I said before call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism in Kashmir and see what happens.

I guess that means my questions blew holes in your argument.

I think you got it back to front. If you call yourself Muhammed Iqbal and then practice Kashmir Brahmin Hinduism in Kashmir then them fellows will blow holes in you.

Did you switch your complaint from being about Hindus in Guyana to Hindus somewhere else in the world? I quote you: "Secular Hindus of Guyana are people who are ashamed of being Hindus ..."

A
Prashad posted:

Those Guyanese Pandits need to get their lazy behinds together and develop a conversion process and program and start converting people before it is too late.

Hindus do not actively practice conversion like other religions. However, if anyone comes and say that their ancestors were forced to convert and they are suffocating in their faith, they will be welcomed. 

Mitwah

Hinduism in Guyana lost a huge chunk of people to Christianity. Those people are not coming back. This has not occurred in East Indian Islam in Guyana. The fault lies in the failure of Pandits to educate the people. Their job is not just to show up to do religious ceremonies and get paid. The time for Hinduism in Guyana to be like Orthodox Judaism and wait for converts to come to them is over.  The Guyanese Pandits have to get out into the public and educate the public on why and how they should become Hindus.

Prashad
Prashad posted:

Hinduism in Guyana lost a huge chunk of people to Christianity. Those people are not coming back. This has not occurred in East Indian Islam in Guyana. The fault lies in the failure of Pandits to educate the people. Their job is not just to show up to do religious ceremonies and get paid. The time for Hinduism in Guyana to be like Orthodox Judaism and wait for converts to come to them is over.  The Guyanese Pandits have to get out into the public and educate the public on why and how they should become Hindus.

Bhai Prashad then you should speak to Hub Cap Daughter, The Maha Sabha, the Pundits council of Guyana and the Swami. Hinduism is rich here in Toronto and the GTA.

Mitwah
Mitwah posted:
Bhai Prashad then you should speak to Hub Cap Daughter, The Maha Sabha, the Pundits council of Guyana and the Swami. Hinduism is rich here in Toronto and the GTA.

Ow man, be respectful to the deceased and say Pandit Reep's daughter, now head of the Dharmic Sabha.

FM
Gilbakka posted:
Mitwah posted:
Bhai Prashad then you should speak to Hub Cap Daughter, The Maha Sabha, the Pundits council of Guyana and the Swami. Hinduism is rich here in Toronto and the GTA.

Ow man, be respectful to the deceased and say Pandit Reep's daughter, now head of the Dharmic Sabha.

I have no respect for him. He was not anti caste and moreover he conducted a fake marriage. He gave Prakash G a hard time, claiming that he was not a Brahmin and turned Pundits against him.

Mitwah
Mitwah posted:
Prashad posted:

Hinduism in Guyana lost a huge chunk of people to Christianity. Those people are not coming back. This has not occurred in East Indian Islam in Guyana. The fault lies in the failure of Pandits to educate the people. Their job is not just to show up to do religious ceremonies and get paid. The time for Hinduism in Guyana to be like Orthodox Judaism and wait for converts to come to them is over.  The Guyanese Pandits have to get out into the public and educate the public on why and how they should become Hindus.

Bhai Prashad then you should speak to Hub Cap Daughter, The Maha Sabha, the Pundits council of Guyana and the Swami. Hinduism is rich here in Toronto and the GTA.

Prashad likes the Pandit's daughter.  She takes time out from her busy schedule to teach the young girls Indian dancing plus she knows a few Bollywood dance moves. 

Prashad
Mitwah posted:
Gilbakka posted:
Mitwah posted:
Bhai Prashad then you should speak to Hub Cap Daughter, The Maha Sabha, the Pundits council of Guyana and the Swami. Hinduism is rich here in Toronto and the GTA.

Ow man, be respectful to the deceased and say Pandit Reep's daughter, now head of the Dharmic Sabha.

I have no respect for him. He was not anti caste and moreover he conducted a fake marriage. He gave Prakash G a hard time, claiming that he was not a Brahmin and turned Pundits against him.

When Prak was in Vancouver for a three-day religious service and we were all staying at the same family house.   This issue came up in a discussion, under religious politics in Guyana. Prak only mentioned it because he was asked, normally I don't believe he would say anything.

Tola
Tola posted:
Mitwah posted:
Gilbakka posted:
Mitwah posted:
Bhai Prashad then you should speak to Hub Cap Daughter, The Maha Sabha, the Pundits council of Guyana and the Swami. Hinduism is rich here in Toronto and the GTA.

Ow man, be respectful to the deceased and say Pandit Reep's daughter, now head of the Dharmic Sabha.

I have no respect for him. He was not anti caste and moreover he conducted a fake marriage. He gave Prakash G a hard time, claiming that he was not a Brahmin and turned Pundits against him.

When Prak was in Vancouver for a three-day religious service and we were all staying at the same family house.   This issue came up in a discussion, under religious politics in Guyana. Prak only mentioned it because he was asked, normally I don't believe he would say anything.

Correct. We learned about it here from other pundits who would attend Prak's Yajna's to idolize him.

Mitwah
Mitwah posted:
I have no respect for him. He was not anti caste and moreover he conducted a fake marriage. He gave Prakash G a hard time, claiming that he was not a Brahmin and turned Pundits against him.

Well, what can I say? At a certain level of my consciousness I've lost respect for all brahmins. They use and abuse the lower castes. And, why did brahmins appropriate to themselves monopoly rights to be pandits? If a chamar educates himself in the Hindu scriptures, philosophy, rituals etc why can't he become a pandit? Pointedly, even if Prakash Gossai were not a brahmin why couldn't Reep recognize his panditing abilities? 

Gilbakka abhors casteism. I am for egalitarianism and social/religious justice. Time for a socialist revolution in Hinduism. 

FM
Gilbakka posted:
Mitwah posted:
I have no respect for him. He was not anti caste and moreover he conducted a fake marriage. He gave Prakash G a hard time, claiming that he was not a Brahmin and turned Pundits against him.

Well, what can I say? At a certain level of my consciousness I've lost respect for all brahmins. They use and abuse the lower castes. And, why did brahmins appropriate to themselves monopoly rights to be pandits? If a chamar educates himself in the Hindu scriptures, philosophy, rituals etc why can't he become a pandit? Pointedly, even if Prakash Gossai were not a brahmin why couldn't Reep recognize his panditing abilities? 

Gilbakka abhors casteism. I am for egalitarianism and social/religious justice. Time for a socialist revolution in Hinduism. 

Gill,

Reep had no problems with my brother [Kasthriya] who became a pandit nor with the Swami,maybe Gossai was more popular suh he doan like him.

Django
Gilbakka posted:
Mitwah posted:
I have no respect for him. He was not anti caste and moreover he conducted a fake marriage. He gave Prakash G a hard time, claiming that he was not a Brahmin and turned Pundits against him.

Well, what can I say? At a certain level of my consciousness I've lost respect for all brahmins. They use and abuse the lower castes. And, why did brahmins appropriate to themselves monopoly rights to be pandits? If a chamar educates himself in the Hindu scriptures, philosophy, rituals etc why can't he become a pandit? Pointedly, even if Prakash Gossai were not a brahmin why couldn't Reep recognize his panditing abilities? 

Gilbakka abhors casteism. I am for egalitarianism and social/religious justice. Time for a socialist revolution in Hinduism. 

Prashad also abhors casteism.  It has such a strong hold on Indians of every religion be it Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism or Islam. Even a religion such as Sikhism some parents that I know encourage their children to marry into the Jat caste.

Prashad
Django posted:
Gilbakka posted:
Mitwah posted:
I have no respect for him. He was not anti caste and moreover he conducted a fake marriage. He gave Prakash G a hard time, claiming that he was not a Brahmin and turned Pundits against him.

Well, what can I say? At a certain level of my consciousness I've lost respect for all brahmins. They use and abuse the lower castes. And, why did brahmins appropriate to themselves monopoly rights to be pandits? If a chamar educates himself in the Hindu scriptures, philosophy, rituals etc why can't he become a pandit? Pointedly, even if Prakash Gossai were not a brahmin why couldn't Reep recognize his panditing abilities? 

Gilbakka abhors casteism. I am for egalitarianism and social/religious justice. Time for a socialist revolution in Hinduism. 

Gill,

Reep had no problems with my brother [Kasthriya] who became a pandit nor with the Swami,maybe Gossai was more popular suh he doan like him.

I know quite a few youths in Guyana who were trained by Pandit Reepue Daman Persaud to become Hindu pandits regardless of social status or so called caste. Reepu was determined to promote Hinduism in Guyana.

Only a few doghsyte here try to taint his efforts in order to please PNC black masters.

FM
Mars posted:

The worst of the lot are the Ballahoo Brahmins who fake this status in order to rob unsuspecting religious people of their hard earned cash. We have one among us on GNI.

Mars, Like everything else you are full of shyte and try to post like the New Nation and anti Indo shyte here on GNI.

If you are referring to Hindu Bramhana Yuji, then you are full of shyte again. Yuji does not support the Karma Kanda section of the Vedas to perform services for fees.

Anyone Bramhana who collects fees for services are committing a grave sin.

As for Bramhana status, anyone is qualified to become a Bramhana if they are trained in the scriptures and have passed rigorous examinations and have qualities as required according to Vedic injunction. 

Vedic Dharma promotes labour according to division of labour. Therefore the four classes. You can climb up or down the ladder, it is your personal choice.

Western societies have the same systems, workers, business men, academics etc. Vedic dharma is no different. The so called caste system in India is man made not in accordance to to Vedic Dharma.

Please do not bring your racist Blackman Shyte here and try to post filth on our Oldest and Great Vedic Dharma. Stop posting Shyte about Hindus and Indos. You are a much bigger racist than Carib.

You are always posting achievements about Blackman and speaking trash about Indos and now Hindus. Keep your trash to yourself.

Yuji calls a spade a spade.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
yuji22 posted:
Mars posted:

The worst of the lot are the Ballahoo Brahmins who fake this status in order to rob unsuspecting religious people of their hard earned cash. We have one among us on GNI.

Mars, Like everything else you are full of shyte and try to post like the New Nation and anti Indo shyte here on GNI.

If you are referring to Hindu Bramhana Yuji, then you are full of shyte again. Yuji does not support the Karma Kanda section of the Vedas to perform services for fees.

Anyone Bramhana who collects fees for services are committing a grave sin.

As for Bramhana status, anyone is qualified to become a Bramhana if they are trained in the scriptures and have passed rigorous examinations and have qualities as required according to Vedic injunction. 

Vedic Dharma promotes labour according to division of labour. Therefore the four classes. You can climb up or down the ladder, it is your personal choice.

Western societies have the same systems, workers, business men, academics etc. Vedic dharma is no different. The so called caste system in India is man made not in accordance to to Vedic Dharma.

Please do not bring your racist Blackman Shyte here and try to post filth on our Oldest and Great Vedic Dharma. Stop posting Shyte about Hindus and Indos. You are a much bigger racist than Carib.

You are always posting achievements about Blackman and speaking trash about Indos and now Hindus. Keep your trash to yourself.

Yuji calls a spade a spade.

 

I didn't name any names but if you want to claim the Ballahoo Brahmin title then who am I to discourage you, Conman.

Oh Please! Everyone knows that you are one of the worst racists on this forum. You have proven that time and time again. You hate black people so much that you're even trying to label me as black so that you can further your own racist agenda. For your info, I'm not speaking out against the Hindu religion. I detest those who con religious people of their hard earned cash by pretending that they have magical powers and that includes people like Joel Osteen. It's not limited to any religion. There's a big difference but I don't expect a dunce like you to understand.

 

Mars
Last edited by Mars
yuji22 posted:

As I said before, you are a worse racist than Carib. Yuji will NEVER tolerate anyone like you posting shyte about Indos and our Great Vedic Dharma.

Keep pretending that I'm Black so that you can further your hatred for Black people.

As I said before, I'm not speaking out against the Hindu religion. I detest those who con religious people of their hard earned cash by pretending that they have magical powers and that includes people like Joel Osteen. It's not limited to any religion. There's a big difference but I don't expect a dunce like you to understand.

Mars
Last edited by Mars

You sir have been put on notice that Yuji will not tolerate you and your anti Indo and anti Hindu Shyte.

You have become a worse racist than Carib. I see this trend of Anti Hindu and Anti Indo sentiment growing since this Afro Led PNC took office.

Hitler did the same when he took office and then attempted to exterminate Jews. We must never allow this to happen again. 

Burnham tried the same shyte but Indos of today are NOT like like Indos of yesterday.

Indos and Hindus will not sit idle and allow this new and growing trend of folks like yourself attempting to humiliate us. Leave us and leave our religion alone !!!

FM
Last edited by Former Member
yuji22 posted:

You sir have been put on notice that Yuji will not tolerate you and your anti Indo and anti Hindu Shyte.

You have become a worse racist than Carib. I see this trend of Anti Hindu and Anti Indo sentiment growing since this Afro Led PNC took office.

Hitler did the same when he took office and then attempted to exterminate Jews. We must never allow this to happen again. 

Burnham tried the same shyte but Indos of today are NOT like like Indos of yesterday.

Indos and Hindus will not sit idle and allow this new and growing trend of folks like yourself attempting to humiliate us. Leave us and leave our religion alone !!!

I guess you'll remain the dunce that you are for life. Keep on pretending that I'm black to promote your own sick racist ideology.

i detest unscrupulous religious leaders of any faith who use their position to rob and rape their flock. If you have a problem with that, tough.

Mars

When Indos speak out for Indo Rights and condemning racists like you who attack our Hindu religion, your only defence is calling them racists.

Please try again. Gone are the days of your usual BS.

FM
yuji22 posted:

When Indos speak out for Indo Rights and condemning racists like you who attack our Hindu religion, your only defence is calling them racists.

Please try again. Gone are the days of your usual BS.

You're one of the prominent members of the GNI KKK   Crew and your own display of anti black prejudice is what makes you a racist. You don't know me from Adam but you have to paint me black to promote your own sick racist ideology. Jackass, I didn't attack any religion in particular. I detest the leaders of any religion who would rob and rape their flock. Apparently you are cool with this type of behavior but I'm not surprised since you seem to be a perfect candidate for someone who would practice these sins against humanity.

Mars

Same old, same old. You are now sounding like a broken record. 

You sir, hate Indos and and their Hindu Religion and have been called out. You can now resort to your BS defence of using the term racist to defend yourself.

You are like the emperor with no clothes.

Unknown-1

Unknown

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Unknown-1
  • Unknown
FM
Last edited by Former Member

ATTENTION yuji22: Be careful how you pick your fights. Mars is not black. His anti-PPP position doesn't mean he is PNC. And, BTW, India's independence anniversary came and went 5 days ago. This thread has served its purpose and is now running on a dangerous track.

FM

Young East Indian Hindus of Guyana must be educated by the older generations of Hindus to see that it is a privilege to be a Hindu. Hindus sacrificed their lives for hundreds of years so that the young people of today can be Hindus and live in the tradition of their Indo-Aryan and Dravidian ancestors. The West Indian creole culture may put down Hinduism as a backward religion of orange cloth and Koolie water rice inferior people. Sure Hinduism does not have a Kareem Abdul Jabbar, Malcolm x or Cat Stephens nor Martin Luther King Jr or Martin Luther himself but Hinduism produced Ramanujan,Gandhi, Bose, George Harrison and even Jiddu Krishnamurti (The Philosopher of Bruce Lee). Its warriors caused the first defeat of Alexander the Great and once ruled from Madras to Malang.  It is a privilege to carry on the traditions of our Indo-Aryan and Dravidian ancestry not a burden to be ashamed of.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
Gilbakka posted:

ATTENTION yuji22: Be careful how you pick your fights. Mars is not black. His anti-PPP position doesn't mean he is PNC. And, BTW, India's independence anniversary came and went 5 days ago. This thread has served its purpose and is now running on a dangerous track.

Mars very well has black in him. He cannot hide his true identity.

99 percent of his posts are Pro PNC and he HATES Indos and Hindus. I had to call him out.

He was born in the Hated PNC family.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
yuji22 posted:
Gilbakka posted:

ATTENTION yuji22: Be careful how you pick your fights. Mars is not black. His anti-PPP position doesn't mean he is PNC. And, BTW, India's independence anniversary came and went 5 days ago. This thread has served its purpose and is now running on a dangerous track.

Mars very well has black in him. He cannot hide his true identity.

99 percent of his posts are Pro PNC and he HATES Indos and Hindus. I had to call him out.

He was born in the Hated PNC family.

You mussi peep me at the urinal but I don't play that game. Gwan suh batty boy.

Mars
yuji22 posted:

As I said before you are Part of the PNC slop can family. Your post is a reflection of your dirty personality. You are shallow, lick your wounds and go home now.

 

A dumbass Piss Pot Porter like you talking about shallow. Hijra Girl, surely you jest. 

Mars
Gilbakka posted:
Mitwah posted:
I have no respect for him. He was not anti caste and moreover he conducted a fake marriage. He gave Prakash G a hard time, claiming that he was not a Brahmin and turned Pundits against him.

Well, what can I say? At a certain level of my consciousness I've lost respect for all brahmins. They use and abuse the lower castes. And, why did brahmins appropriate to themselves monopoly rights to be pandits? If a chamar educates himself in the Hindu scriptures, philosophy, rituals etc why can't he become a pandit? Pointedly, even if Prakash Gossai were not a brahmin why couldn't Reep recognize his panditing abilities? 

Gilbakka abhors casteism. I am for egalitarianism and social/religious justice. Time for a socialist revolution in Hinduism. 

FM
Leonora posted:

You guys are teaching me how to fight. I'll keep these words handy and will use them when attacked.  

It's not nice watching people fight. Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God. Have a nice day. 

FM
Gilbakka posted:
Leonora posted:

You guys are teaching me how to fight. I'll keep these words handy and will use them when attacked.  

It's not nice watching people fight. Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God. Have a nice day. 

Me use to like watch two women in Guyana cuss down wan anada. So me cyan't be called the child of God? Thanks Rev Gill.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×