USA angry as Russia massively bombs ISIS

'We have been receiving military support from America'

 

Russian warplanes carried out two airstrikes Thursday targeting the training camp in Idlib of a Syrian rebel group supported by the CIA, a rebel commander told CNN.

"Our training camp is located in Jabel al Zawia in Idlib and we have been receiving military support from America to help fight Daesh in Aleppo and Idlib," said Hassna Haj Ali, the commander of the northern division of Suqur al Jabal brigade.

The group has been fighting ISIS in northern Syria for over a year.

Ali said no one was killed by the Russian airstrikes.

However, Syrian activist Khdaier Khushfa in Homs told CNN via Skype that 17 civilians had been killed in Talbesieh and 11 others in Zafaraniya by the Russian airstrikes Wednesday, and 46 people had been critically wounded.

"We are very concerned of what will happen next. Civilians I spoke to are very scared," Khushfa said. "It's like after five years since the revolution started we are back to ground zero."

 

 

This goes to show how more powerful the Russian bombs and missiles are,and how more scared the terrorists are of Russia instead of the US. In just two days Russia has done more damage to these islamic terrorists than the US has managed to do all year.  Did anyone notice that the Russians used theromobaric missiles? I didn't even know that those things existed. The Russians invented the thermobaric bombs, which the US has since copied. Those things are only surpassed by nuclear bombs. I can see why the jihadists are shitting themselves.

Originally Posted by RiffRaff:

Yall living in la la land...

 

Putin there because Assad was about to be overthrown because of US actions...

And what exactly were those US actions? From the group of terrorists that the US trained, only four are still alive. Most of the group were captured by ISIS when they crossed the Turkish border into Syria. The Turks had sold them out. All of the weapons that the US had given them ended up in the hand of iSIS. The US has done next to nothing in Syria, except for dropping bombs in the desert once a week and claiming that it would take years to defeat ISIS. The Russians attack those terrorists over just two days and everybody getting scared. Conclusion: the US only claimed to be attacking iSIS. 

Originally Posted by Lucas:

Good on you Russia.

You are exposing ISIS as a west proxy...

Russians are in homs. Isis is on the other side of the country. ISIS as a proxy for the west is typifies you not  as the lunatic fringe but its bleeding heart.

Originally Posted by Mr.T:

This goes to show how more powerful the Russian bombs and missiles are,and how more scared the terrorists are of Russia instead of the US. In just two days Russia has done more damage to these islamic terrorists than the US has managed to do all year.  Did anyone notice that the Russians used theromobaric missiles? I didn't even know that those things existed. The Russians invented the thermobaric bombs, which the US has since copied. Those things are only surpassed by nuclear bombs. I can see why the jihadists are shitting themselves.

Russians are using old planes and out of date munitions in this campaign. Look at the missiles. They ignite under the planes in a vast glow that had there been intercept capability on the ground they would hit nothing. It looks that their planes will ignite when these things go off. American missiles drop from the planes and then begin their burn.

 

Both sides have frightening tech that even mid sixties versions can decimate any army on the ground. We should not go about counting  who has more matches when one is standing in a room full of gasoline.

Originally Posted by Nehru:

Putin is the man!!  Get the BASTARDS!!!!!!

Putin is as usual a backward ass. His support for Assad only prolong  this violence. No one on the ground wants him and he will never be able to reconstitute a nation. This fellow should have left a decade ago.

Originally Posted by RiffRaff:

Yall living in la la land...

 

Putin there because Assad was about to be overthrown because of US actions...

correct. He has the misguided idea that killing anti Assad forces can rebuild Syria. He should be bombing Raqqa instead of Homs.

Originally Posted by Lucas:

Good on you Russia.

You are exposing ISIS as a west proxy...

Russia did not bomb ISIS until yesterday. ISIS Is a us proxy if your mama is a goat. It looks highly plausible given the dumb shit you post here but even a goat would react with terrible insult to his pride for me saying that.

Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:

Good on you Russia.

You are exposing ISIS as a west proxy...

Russia did not bomb ISIS until yesterday. ISIS Is a us proxy if your mama is a goat. It looks highly plausible given the dumb shit you post here but even a goat would react with terrible insult to his pride for me saying that.

Whatever you call ISIS, I am celebrating its obliteration at the hands of the Russians.

Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:

Good on you Russia.

You are exposing ISIS as a west proxy...

Russia did not bomb ISIS until yesterday. ISIS Is a us proxy if your mama is a goat. It looks highly plausible given the dumb shit you post here but even a goat would react with terrible insult to his pride for me saying that.

Whatever you call ISIS, I am celebrating its obliteration at the hands of the Russians.

Just saying the celebration is premature. Russia will fail because they have to go all the way to the outskirts of Bhagdad to be successful. It is vast barren wastelands with scattered hostage populations and these have to be protected by some substantial ground policing force for a long while to be free of those reversed humans.

Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:

Good on you Russia.

You are exposing ISIS as a west proxy...

Russia did not bomb ISIS until yesterday. ISIS Is a us proxy if your mama is a goat. It looks highly plausible given the dumb shit you post here but even a goat would react with terrible insult to his pride for me saying that.

Whatever you call ISIS, I am celebrating its obliteration at the hands of the Russians.

Just saying the celebration is premature. Russia will fail because they have to go all the way to the outskirts of Bhagdad to be successful. It is vast barren wastelands with scattered hostage populations and these have to be protected by some substantial ground policing force for a long while to be free of those reversed humans.

Really. If so, why is David Cameron so upset? 

Listen, the Anti-Chechen troops will hunt the ISIS chickens and will roast them, unlike the Americans who send their embedded CIA crooks to offer the terrorist paper money if they turn against Assad and become moderate opposition.

 

Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:

Good on you Russia.

You are exposing ISIS as a west proxy...

Russia did not bomb ISIS until yesterday. ISIS Is a us proxy if your mama is a goat. It looks highly plausible given the dumb shit you post here but even a goat would react with terrible insult to his pride for me saying that.

Whatever you call ISIS, I am celebrating its obliteration at the hands of the Russians.

Just saying the celebration is premature. Russia will fail because they have to go all the way to the outskirts of Bhagdad to be successful. It is vast barren wastelands with scattered hostage populations and these have to be protected by some substantial ground policing force for a long while to be free of those reversed humans.

Really. If so, why is David Cameron so upset? 

Listen, the Anti-Chechen troops will hunt the ISIS chickens and will roast them, unlike the Americans who send their embedded CIA crooks to offer the terrorist paper money if they turn against Assad and become moderate opposition.

 

They are upset because Russia is propping up Assad and killing their surrogates fighting against them. Russia can if it cares for the people there, do the right thing and demand he leaves and act with western powers to create a stable government after eradicating ISIS. But that is not Putin's  play. He is more concern with looking big and bold and bad and not about the reality of the people there. He has not offered the fleeing Muslims sanctuary. He can since he is closer to them than Europe.

Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:

Good on you Russia.

You are exposing ISIS as a west proxy...

Russia did not bomb ISIS until yesterday. ISIS Is a us proxy if your mama is a goat. It looks highly plausible given the dumb shit you post here but even a goat would react with terrible insult to his pride for me saying that.

Whatever you call ISIS, I am celebrating its obliteration at the hands of the Russians.

Just saying the celebration is premature. Russia will fail because they have to go all the way to the outskirts of Bhagdad to be successful. It is vast barren wastelands with scattered hostage populations and these have to be protected by some substantial ground policing force for a long while to be free of those reversed humans.

Really. If so, why is David Cameron so upset? 

Listen, the Anti-Chechen troops will hunt the ISIS chickens and will roast them, unlike the Americans who send their embedded CIA crooks to offer the terrorist paper money if they turn against Assad and become moderate opposition.

 

They are upset because Russia is propping up Assad and killing their surrogates fighting against them. Russia can if it cares for the people there, do the right thing and demand he leaves and act with western powers to create a stable government after eradicating ISIS. But that is not Putin's  play. He is more concern with looking big and bold and bad and not about the reality of the people there. He has not offered the fleeing Muslims sanctuary. He can since he is closer to them than Europe.

Oh Yeah..The Russians are bad, because they are not Anglos. Anglos are the morally superior people, that's why God gave them the black race in slavery and the Indian nation in servitude.

Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:

Good on you Russia.

You are exposing ISIS as a west proxy...

Russia did not bomb ISIS until yesterday. ISIS Is a us proxy if your mama is a goat. It looks highly plausible given the dumb shit you post here but even a goat would react with terrible insult to his pride for me saying that.

Whatever you call ISIS, I am celebrating its obliteration at the hands of the Russians.

Just saying the celebration is premature. Russia will fail because they have to go all the way to the outskirts of Bhagdad to be successful. It is vast barren wastelands with scattered hostage populations and these have to be protected by some substantial ground policing force for a long while to be free of those reversed humans.

Really. If so, why is David Cameron so upset? 

Listen, the Anti-Chechen troops will hunt the ISIS chickens and will roast them, unlike the Americans who send their embedded CIA crooks to offer the terrorist paper money if they turn against Assad and become moderate opposition.

 

They are upset because Russia is propping up Assad and killing their surrogates fighting against them. Russia can if it cares for the people there, do the right thing and demand he leaves and act with western powers to create a stable government after eradicating ISIS. But that is not Putin's  play. He is more concern with looking big and bold and bad and not about the reality of the people there. He has not offered the fleeing Muslims sanctuary. He can since he is closer to them than Europe.

Oh Yeah..The Russians are bad, because they are not Anglos. Anglos are the morally superior people, that's why God gave them the black race in slavery and the Indian nation in servitude.

Russians to anglos are just a matter of ideology and not color or ethnicity which are meaningless in my mental framework in assessing what is best for humanity. I do not subscribe to superiority of peoples but to philosophy. I also broker no arguments about god since I might as well be speaking of unicorns.

Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:

Good on you Russia.

You are exposing ISIS as a west proxy...

Russia did not bomb ISIS until yesterday. ISIS Is a us proxy if your mama is a goat. It looks highly plausible given the dumb shit you post here but even a goat would react with terrible insult to his pride for me saying that.

Whatever you call ISIS, I am celebrating its obliteration at the hands of the Russians.

Just saying the celebration is premature. Russia will fail because they have to go all the way to the outskirts of Bhagdad to be successful. It is vast barren wastelands with scattered hostage populations and these have to be protected by some substantial ground policing force for a long while to be free of those reversed humans.

Really. If so, why is David Cameron so upset? 

Listen, the Anti-Chechen troops will hunt the ISIS chickens and will roast them, unlike the Americans who send their embedded CIA crooks to offer the terrorist paper money if they turn against Assad and become moderate opposition.

 

They are upset because Russia is propping up Assad and killing their surrogates fighting against them. Russia can if it cares for the people there, do the right thing and demand he leaves and act with western powers to create a stable government after eradicating ISIS. But that is not Putin's  play. He is more concern with looking big and bold and bad and not about the reality of the people there. He has not offered the fleeing Muslims sanctuary. He can since he is closer to them than Europe.

Oh Yeah..The Russians are bad, because they are not Anglos. Anglos are the morally superior people, that's why God gave them the black race in slavery and the Indian nation in servitude.

Russians to anglos are just a matter of ideology and not color or ethnicity which are meaningless in my mental framework in assessing what is best for humanity. I do not subscribe to superiority of peoples but to philosophy. I also broker no arguments about god since I might as well be speaking of unicorns.

So your skin color doesn't matter anymore...Hooray!

Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:

Good on you Russia.

You are exposing ISIS as a west proxy...

Russia did not bomb ISIS until yesterday. ISIS Is a us proxy if your mama is a goat. It looks highly plausible given the dumb shit you post here but even a goat would react with terrible insult to his pride for me saying that.

Whatever you call ISIS, I am celebrating its obliteration at the hands of the Russians.

Just saying the celebration is premature. Russia will fail because they have to go all the way to the outskirts of Bhagdad to be successful. It is vast barren wastelands with scattered hostage populations and these have to be protected by some substantial ground policing force for a long while to be free of those reversed humans.

Really. If so, why is David Cameron so upset? 

Listen, the Anti-Chechen troops will hunt the ISIS chickens and will roast them, unlike the Americans who send their embedded CIA crooks to offer the terrorist paper money if they turn against Assad and become moderate opposition.

 

They are upset because Russia is propping up Assad and killing their surrogates fighting against them. Russia can if it cares for the people there, do the right thing and demand he leaves and act with western powers to create a stable government after eradicating ISIS. But that is not Putin's  play. He is more concern with looking big and bold and bad and not about the reality of the people there. He has not offered the fleeing Muslims sanctuary. He can since he is closer to them than Europe.

Oh Yeah..The Russians are bad, because they are not Anglos. Anglos are the morally superior people, that's why God gave them the black race in slavery and the Indian nation in servitude.

Russians to anglos are just a matter of ideology and not color or ethnicity which are meaningless in my mental framework in assessing what is best for humanity. I do not subscribe to superiority of peoples but to philosophy. I also broker no arguments about god since I might as well be speaking of unicorns.

So your skin color doesn't matter anymore...Hooray!

I guess you hate Russians because they never purchase black slaves.. Had they done that many  Africans would be loyal to Russia in the same way Africans today are loyal to the former masters.

Originally Posted by Lucas:
 

I guess you hate Russians because they never purchase black slaves.. Had they done that many  Africans would be loyal to Russia in the same way Africans today are loyal to the former masters.

They used white slaves instead. See Eastern Europe after WWII plus some other stooges around the world like Jagan and Burnham.

Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by D2:
Originally Posted by Lucas:

Good on you Russia.

You are exposing ISIS as a west proxy...

Russia did not bomb ISIS until yesterday. ISIS Is a us proxy if your mama is a goat. It looks highly plausible given the dumb shit you post here but even a goat would react with terrible insult to his pride for me saying that.

Whatever you call ISIS, I am celebrating its obliteration at the hands of the Russians.

Just saying the celebration is premature. Russia will fail because they have to go all the way to the outskirts of Bhagdad to be successful. It is vast barren wastelands with scattered hostage populations and these have to be protected by some substantial ground policing force for a long while to be free of those reversed humans.

Really. If so, why is David Cameron so upset? 

Listen, the Anti-Chechen troops will hunt the ISIS chickens and will roast them, unlike the Americans who send their embedded CIA crooks to offer the terrorist paper money if they turn against Assad and become moderate opposition.

 

They are upset because Russia is propping up Assad and killing their surrogates fighting against them. Russia can if it cares for the people there, do the right thing and demand he leaves and act with western powers to create a stable government after eradicating ISIS. But that is not Putin's  play. He is more concern with looking big and bold and bad and not about the reality of the people there. He has not offered the fleeing Muslims sanctuary. He can since he is closer to them than Europe.

Oh Yeah..The Russians are bad, because they are not Anglos. Anglos are the morally superior people, that's why God gave them the black race in slavery and the Indian nation in servitude.

Russians to anglos are just a matter of ideology and not color or ethnicity which are meaningless in my mental framework in assessing what is best for humanity. I do not subscribe to superiority of peoples but to philosophy. I also broker no arguments about god since I might as well be speaking of unicorns.

So your skin color doesn't matter anymore...Hooray!

I guess you hate Russians because they never purchase black slaves.. Had they done that many  Africans would be loyal to Russia in the same way Africans today are loyal to the former masters.

Slavery in Russia, ended in the early 20th century. It was a feudal society where an upper crust french speaking royals presided over a massive fiefdom of Russian speaking peoples.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×