Skip to main content

Wife, friend sentenced to death for murdering US man.

From left are Surojinie Tirmaul and Hemwattie Abdulla

 

Hemwattie Abdulla, also known as ‘Annie’, 42, and her friend, Seerojini Permaul, known as ‘Usha,’ 49, were yesterday both sentenced to death for murdering the former’s husband.

The two women were found guilty earlier this month of murdering Abdool Shakeel Majid, a United States citizen, in 2012.

 

After probation reports were read for the women, Justice Sandil Kissoon handed down the death sentences at the Berbice High Court.

Before reading sentencing, he said it was unfortunate that both accused engaged in such conduct after overcoming so much in their lives.

Abdool Shakeel Majid

However, he said the court could not turn a blind eye to the circumstances which led to the death of Majid.

He noted that the facts of the case spoke of the calculated events that were set in motion by the women, with the singular objective of bringing about the death of the victim.

According to the judge, for obvious reasons the widow was not willing to commit the act in the United States, but then involved Permaul to identify an individual to kill Majid, who was a father of one.

He said, Permaul for US$5,000 permitted Abdulla to use her and her (Permaul’s) family, and had it not been for that the victim may have been alive.

Abdulla fainted as she was waiting to be transported to the New Amsterdam Prison. She was revived shortly after.

According to the probation report on Abdulla, which was read in court yesterday, she was a domestic worker at a young age until she met a man, whom she would go on to marry.

The mother of six gave birth to her first child at the age of 15. However, after the birth of her children, she and her family migrated to the United States, where they were residing in her in-laws’ basement.

 

She then acquired a job and met the now deceased, Majid, who was a taxi driver. After her husband became suspicious, he accused her of having an affair, which led to his parents asking her to vacate the home.

Shortly after, she moved in with Majid, who she then went on to wed, according to Islamic rites.

According to the report, Abdulla was described as a quiet person, who kept to herself most of the time. She has served as an orderly while in prison and was said to behave in a respectful manner.

The report also noted that despite the verdict, Abdulla continued to claim her innocence, noting that she had no reason to kill Majid, who she claims she was in love with.

Meanwhile, according to the probation report read for Permaul, she began to work at an early age to help send her siblings to school because her father had started to drink regularly and was unable to contribute to improve their financial situation.

After she was married and had three children with her husband, he left suddenly without giving any explanation.  The report said she later saw her husband and she told him that she would leave the children in his care but he refused and later died in May of the same year.

Permaul was described as a person with good qualities by her fellow villagers, and it was noted that she was an orderly at the prison, as she was well mannered and very respectful of her fellow inmates and the prison authority.

Permaul also continued to deny the allegation of murder, according to the report, which said she maintained that she had no reason to kill Majid, since she did not know him nor had she ever met him.

At yesterday’s sentencing, the courtroom was packed to capacity with relatives of the two women and the dead man.

As the judge read the sentence, the accused’s relatives began to weep instantly, while Majid’s relatives looked at each other and shook their heads in agreement with the sentence.

The case was prosecuted in by attorney Ganesh Hira.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Man gets life sentence for chopping neighbour who complained about music.

March 30 2018

Source

Andy Boodram was yesterday handed a life sentence by Justice Navindra Singh after being found guilty by a jury of chopping his neighbour, who had asked him to turn down the volume of the music he was playing.

Boodram, 32, a father of three, appeared visibly shocked as did his relatives when the judge announced the sentence.

Given a chance to speak, Boodram called ‘Boy,’ said he was in a fight with the complainant, Deonarine Persaud, called ‘Anil,’ but maintained that he never chopped him.

“It was a fight, but I didn’t chop Anil,” the convict said, while casting the blame on someone else, whom he claimed to have also been a part of the fight.

Boodram had been indicted for attempted murder and the jury found him not guilty by a proportion of 11 to 1. It was on the alternative count of felonious wounding that he was however, convicted by a proportion of 10 to 2. The jury found him guilty of wounding Persaud on September 24th, 2011, with intent to maim, disfigure, disable or cause him serious bodily harm.

Defence attorney George Thomas had begged the court for the most minimum of sentences, advancing that his client had no previous conviction.

For her part, however, Prosecutor Abigail Gibbs advanced that having been found guilty by his peers, Boodram needed to pay the full consequences of his actions.

She asked the court to consider the effect the injuries have had on the complainant, while highlighting the several surgeries he has had to undergo and the extent of those operations.

Of concern to the prosecutor also was the fact that Boodram used a cutlass to inflict the injuries. She impressed upon the court that the type of weapon used needed to be considered as well.

Before imposing the sentence, Justice Singh asked Boodram whether he was maintaining that it was someone else who had chopped the complainant, to which he responded in the affirmative.

Thereafter, the judge noted that for the offence committed, the law provides for life imprisonment and flogging.

“But I will not sentence you to flogging. I will sentence you to life imprisonment,” the judge declared.

“That is the sentence of the court,” Justice Singh told the shocked Boodram.

In his testimony, Persaud had recalled being chopped several times by Boodram, whom he had asked to lower his music as his sick infant son had been sleeping at the time.

Despite repeated appeals, however, the witness said Boodram, who hurled a series of expletives at him and refused to lower the volume of the music.

Persaud had told the court that as he stood conversing with a friend in front of his yard, he heard the friend exclaim, “Anil run! Boy coming with a cutlass!”

He said he did not run at that time and just as he turned towards the direction from which his attacker was coming, he encountered the man swinging a cutlass in front of him.

In the midst of inflicting numerous broadsides, Persaud said that Boodram chopped him twice on the head and once to his left thumb as he tried to bar the chops. He showed the court the scars which he said were the result of the attack.

Persaud said he fell to the ground and remembered clearly seeing the accused standing over, and still broadsiding him, moments before losing consciousness. He later woke in the Georgetown Public Hospital.

He recalled being hospitalised for some six months, during which time he had to undergo several surgeries and had to do numerous follow-up treatments.

The defence contended, however, that it was Boodram who was attacked by Persaud and another person.

According to Thomas, the other person in whose company Persaud was at the time, had been wielding the cutlass at Boodram but it missed and connected with Persaud instead, resulting in the injuries he sustained.

Under cross-examination, the complainant disagreed with counsel’s suggestion that it was a fight and that he was injured during a scuffle.

He also disagreed with Thomas’ suggestion that he was armed and that he was “making up the story” maintaining that it was Boodram who had chopped him.

Django

West Coast Berbice man gets 65 years for raping two minors.

Source

March 29 2018

A West Coast Berbice man, Krishna Tulapersaud of Bath Settlement, West Coast Berbice was yesterday sentenced to a total of 65 years on two counts of rape.

After the jury came back with a guilty verdict on both counts of rape, yesterday afternoon, Justice Sandil Kissoon sentenced the man to 14 years on the first count, and then gave him 51 years on the second count. The sentences will run consecutively.

According to the case, the incidents occurred on more than one occasion.

He was represented by attorney at law, Charrandas Persaud.

Django

Man gets two life sentences for raping child.

March 28 2018

Source

Sheldon Lynch was yesterday afternoon sentenced to two consecutive life sentences by Justice Simone Morris-Ramlall after he was convicted of raping a child on two occasions, beginning when she was 10.

Sheldon Lynch

After about three hours of deliberations, a 12-member jury returned its unanimous verdicts, convicting Lynch on two of the four counts levelled against him for raping the same child.

Lynch was convicted for raping the child in December of 2010 and November of 2011.

The jury was, however, unable to arrive at verdicts for charges that he had also raped the child on January 1st and December 31st of 2012; and then again on January 25th of 2013.

The judge ordered that Lynch spend a minimum of 35 years on each conviction before being paroled.

Given a chance to speak, the tearful 46-year-old father of two maintained his innocence, while he attempted to question the court on aspects of the evidence.

“The jury has found you guilty,” the judge, however, stated, even as she admonished him to wisely use the opportunity he had been given to address the court before sentencing.

Explaining to Lynch that the trial had already ended, Justice Morris-Ramlall further reminded the convict that he had been represented by counsel who had the leverage of cross-examining witnesses.

“My Honour, I am speaking the truth; I did not do anything,” Lynch maintained.

Meanwhile, in a plea of mitigation, defence attorney Clyde Forde begged on his client’s behalf for mercy, and the imposition of a sentence “as lenient as possible,” while noting that the man has two young children he would like the opportunity of seeing grow up.

Counsel advanced that a severe sentence would take Lynch away from his children.

Meanwhile, the victim, now 18, according to an impact statement read to the court, spoke of the trauma and fear she still experiences from the assault and her desire of seeing Lynch punished for what he did to her.

The statement was read by Social Worker of Blossom Inc., Renesha Calendar, who said the young woman spoke of being raped repeatedly by Lynch and the many threats he would make to her not to tell anyone. “My life changed after he raped me,” the statement quoted her as saying.

Because of the shame she felt from the assault, she reported that she dropped out of school and had tried to commit suicide.

The young woman also spoke of her childhood being destroyed and the difficulty and fear she has in having relationships.

Noting that she had considered the nature and circumstances under which the assault occurred, Justice Morris-Ramlall told the convict that the child had trusted and became fond of him “until you changed and treated her like your woman.”

“At age 10 you violated her repeatedly…,” the judge said. “She is still a long way from recovering, if ever,” the judge went on to say.

Justice Morris-Ramlall noted too that while counsel had begged for mercy, the convict showed no remorse nor regard for the verdict of his peers, neither personally, nor through his lawyer.

There must be a “balancing act” when weighing justice and mercy, the judge said.

The judge thereafter sentenced him to two consecutive life sentences, ordering that he spends a minimum of 35 years on each charge before becoming eligible for parole.

The state was represented by prosecutors Orinthia Schmidt and Seeta Bishundial.

The trial proceedings were held in-camera at the Sexual Offences Court of the Georgetown High Court.

Django

What nonsense.  The justice system is one institution which have functioned independently. 

So is wah alyuh sayin, the new govt influencing court decisions! If so, is it really functioning?

Baseman
Django posted:
Bibi Haniffa posted:

Who woke up the justice system?  And when?

Looks like you nah see,recently some kriminals getting hevy sentences.

Bullshit!!   Didn’t granger free many prisoners?

Baseman
Baseman posted:

What nonsense.  The justice system is one institution which have functioned independently. 

So is wah alyuh sayin, the new govt influencing court decisions! If so, is it really functioning?

The previous government turned a blind eye to drug runnings in the country in so doing the place became like the wild West. As we are all aware they even formed a group(s) to take out what the said were the bad guys while they made it smooth sailing for others to carry on their lucrative "business"

cain
Baseman posted:
Django posted:
Bibi Haniffa posted:

Who woke up the justice system?  And when?

Looks like you nah see,recently some kriminals getting hevy sentences.

Bullshit!!   Didn’t granger free many prisoners?

Nonsense, you are being petty now.

cain
cain posted:
Baseman posted:

What nonsense.  The justice system is one institution which have functioned independently. 

So is wah alyuh sayin, the new govt influencing court decisions! If so, is it really functioning?

The previous government turned a blind eye to drug runnings in the country in so doing the place became like the wild West. As we are all aware they even formed a group(s) to take out what the said were the bad guys while they made it smooth sailing for others to carry on their lucrative "business"

Last time I checked, Guyana still has a drug export problem. Should we blame the current government now? Why not? As long as poverty is a problem in Guyana, drugs will be there. This is true also in America.

FM
skeldon_man posted:
cain posted:
Baseman posted:

What nonsense.  The justice system is one institution which have functioned independently. 

So is wah alyuh sayin, the new govt influencing court decisions! If so, is it really functioning?

The previous government turned a blind eye to drug runnings in the country in so doing the place became like the wild West. As we are all aware they even formed a group(s) to take out what the said were the bad guys while they made it smooth sailing for others to carry on their lucrative "business"

Last time I checked, Guyana still has a drug export problem. Should we blame the current government now? Why not? As long as poverty is a problem in Guyana, drugs will be there. This is true also in America.

Skelly,seriously in our days,most of us were poor and didn't turn to the business of drugs.Before i migrate that business was at minimum.

What do you say is that true?

Django
Last edited by Django
cain posted:

Drugs were not in abundance making it a lucrative "business" as it was/is the last 10-15 years when Guyana became the hub. 

Lots of folks are in denial,the period it became wide spread.

Django
Last edited by Django
Django posted:
cain posted:

Drugs were not in abundance making it a lucrative "business" as it was/is the last 10-15 years when Guyana became the hub. 

Lots of folks are in denial,the period it became wide spread.

It’s been in abundance internationally not only Guyana .

widen your vision!! 

FM
Django posted:
skeldon_man posted:
cain posted:
Baseman posted:

What nonsense.  The justice system is one institution which have functioned independently. 

So is wah alyuh sayin, the new govt influencing court decisions! If so, is it really functioning?

The previous government turned a blind eye to drug runnings in the country in so doing the place became like the wild West. As we are all aware they even formed a group(s) to take out what the said were the bad guys while they made it smooth sailing for others to carry on their lucrative "business"

Last time I checked, Guyana still has a drug export problem. Should we blame the current government now? Why not? As long as poverty is a problem in Guyana, drugs will be there. This is true also in America.

Skelly,seriously in our days,most of us were poor and didn't turn to the business of drugs.Before i migrate that business was at minimum.

What do you say is that true?

Rass Djanjo , PNC should hired you back to control the business . 

Was it you who guard the border with Norman Maclean .. good to know !!

FM
Dave posted:
Django posted:
cain posted:

Drugs were not in abundance making it a lucrative "business" as it was/is the last 10-15 years when Guyana became the hub. 

Lots of folks are in denial,the period it became wide spread.

It’s been in abundance internationally not only Guyana .

widen your vision!! 

Focus on Guyana and the period it became widespread.

Django
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
cain posted:

Drugs were not in abundance making it a lucrative "business" as it was/is the last 10-15 years when Guyana became the hub. 

Lots of folks are in denial,the period it became wide spread.

It’s been in abundance internationally not only Guyana .

widen your vision!! 

Focus on Guyana and the period it became widespread.

Dude, we lean more of it because of tecnology . 

The last two decades, we saw drugs like opioid and fentanly becomes wide spread world wide . Should we blame the politicians of those era .

regarding Guyana , the younger generation don’t want to work , community centre are taken over by bushes. Religious leaders were involve sexually with church members .

 

Should PPP and PNC haul these young people to work or community activities if they don’t want to  ... banna haul you backside , the devil has taken over the world .. you en see 

FM
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
cain posted:

Drugs were not in abundance making it a lucrative "business" as it was/is the last 10-15 years when Guyana became the hub. 

Lots of folks are in denial,the period it became wide spread.

It’s been in abundance internationally not only Guyana .

widen your vision!! 

Focus on Guyana and the period it became widespread.

........The last two decades, we saw drugs like opioid and fentanly becomes wide spread world wide . Should we blame the politicians of those era ..

If they turned the other way/ encouraged it and if they turned down assistance by other countries ... yes.

cain
Last edited by cain
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
cain posted:

Drugs were not in abundance making it a lucrative "business" as it was/is the last 10-15 years when Guyana became the hub. 

Lots of folks are in denial,the period it became wide spread.

It’s been in abundance internationally not only Guyana .

widen your vision!! 

Focus on Guyana and the period it became widespread.

Should PPP and PNC haul these young people to work or community activities if they don’t want to  ... banna haul you backside , the devil has taken over the world .. you en see 

You reminds of a co-worker who was the vehicle driver and helper(an American).He was successful in the illegal activities from pimping etc,one raid he lost everything,upon reflection of his past,he will say the world will end soon.

By the way Gov't and community leaders sets the example,when there are a bunch of crooks chosen,what can you expect the population to become.

Django
Last edited by Django
Django posted:
Bibi Haniffa posted:

Who woke up the justice system?  And when?

Looks like you nah see,recently some kriminals getting hevy sentences.

Just a few years back the crimes were modest, such as pick pocket, choke and rob, break and enter. Today the criminals have open season with the crimes being murder and rape, perhaps it's the political climate conducive.

K
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
cain posted:

Drugs were not in abundance making it a lucrative "business" as it was/is the last 10-15 years when Guyana became the hub. 

Lots of folks are in denial,the period it became wide spread.

It’s been in abundance internationally not only Guyana .

widen your vision!! 

Focus on Guyana and the period it became widespread.

Should PPP and PNC haul these young people to work or community activities if they don’t want to  ... banna haul you backside , the devil has taken over the world .. you en see 

You reminds of a co-worker who was the vehicle driver and helper(an American).He was successful in the illegal activities from pimping etc,one raid he lost everything,upon reflection of his past,he will say the world will end soon.

By the way Gov't and community leaders sets the example,when there are a bunch of crooks chosen,what can you expect the population to become.

I gon make it simple fo you . How many of us are respectable parents , did the best for our kids .. but some kids went their own way . We should blame the parents .. right 

i hope you comprehend what I man saying .

i know u smart ... use it

FM
Dave posted

I gon make it simple fo you . How many of us are respectable parents , did the best for our kids .. but some kids went their own way . We should blame the parents .. right 

i hope you comprehend what I man saying .

i know u smart ... use it

If parents turned away from seeing the wrongs of their children and if the parents are offered assistance in order the kids are brought up in a decent environment...brought up to respect but the parents do not accept this help...yes they get the blame.

cain
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
cain posted:

Drugs were not in abundance making it a lucrative "business" as it was/is the last 10-15 years when Guyana became the hub. 

Lots of folks are in denial,the period it became wide spread.

It’s been in abundance internationally not only Guyana .

widen your vision!! 

Focus on Guyana and the period it became widespread.

Should PPP and PNC haul these young people to work or community activities if they don’t want to  ... banna haul you backside , the devil has taken over the world .. you en see 

You reminds of a co-worker who was the vehicle driver and helper(an American).He was successful in the illegal activities from pimping etc,one raid he lost everything,upon reflection of his past,he will say the world will end soon.

By the way Gov't and community leaders sets the example,when there are a bunch of crooks chosen,what can you expect the population to become.

I gon make it simple fo you . How many of us are respectable parents , did the best for our kids .. but some kids went their own way . We should blame the parents .. right 

i hope you comprehend what I man saying .

i know u smart ... use it

Oww brother,that's too simple.

Django
VishMahabir posted:

Question...does Guyana have capital punishment...i thought this was abolished?

The women above were given death sentence.

If Guyana has the death penalty, then by what method??

Just asking

We dozz hang dem rass....by dem neck!!

Baseman
Baseman posted:
VishMahabir posted:

Question...does Guyana have capital punishment...i thought this was abolished?

The women above were given death sentence.

If Guyana has the death penalty, then by what method??

Just asking

We dozz hang dem rass....by dem neck!!

I don't think Granger will sign the order.

Mitwah
Prince posted:

I posted this story before the sentence but I am shocked to hear they were given the death penalty. This is too harsh for two middle-aged women in my opinion. 

The Judge took into account that it was premeditated. 

Mitwah
Prince posted:

I posted this story before the sentence but I am shocked to hear they were given the death penalty. This is too harsh for two middle-aged women in my opinion. 

What does that have to do with anything?  Hang dem rass!!

Baseman
Mitwah posted:
Prince posted:

I posted this story before the sentence but I am shocked to hear they were given the death penalty. This is too harsh for two middle-aged women in my opinion. 

The Judge took into account that it was premeditated. 

How many murders are accidental? I don't think this is the first premeditated murder the judge ever ruled on. When thieves targetted your home for a midnight robbery it's premeditated. Why kill two healthy women and spare the men? 

FM
Prince posted:
Mitwah posted:
Prince posted:

I posted this story before the sentence but I am shocked to hear they were given the death penalty. This is too harsh for two middle-aged women in my opinion. 

The Judge took into account that it was premeditated. 

How many murders are accidental? I don't think this is the first premeditated murder the judge ever ruled on. When thieves targetted your home for a midnight robbery it's premeditated. Why kill two healthy women and spare the men? 

You are not comparing orange with orange. 

Mitwah

Women accomplices sentenced to death

Hemwattie Abdulla and the deceased, Abdool Shakeel Majid, on their wedding day

… for 2012 murder of US citizen home on vacation

JUSTICE Sandil Kissoon on Thursday imposed the death penalty on Hemwattie Abdulla, 42, of Ozone Park, Queens, New York, and Surojni Permaul, 48, Belvedere Settlement, Corentyne.

FM

Youth gets 14 years for killing Nonpareil pensioner

-friend who helped dispose body freed after two years awaiting trial

April 4 2018

Source

After admitting to killing his father-in-law, whom he bludgeoned to the head with an axe, Veeram Dias was yesterday sentenced to spend the next 14 years behind bars by Justice Sandil Kissoon.

Dias was one of three persons charged with murdering Nonpareil pensioner Roger Manikam.

A fourth person, Devon Brown, who had been charged with being an accessory to the crime after he helped dispose of the body walked out the court a free man yesterday after the judge informed him that he would be granted remission for the two years he had been awaiting trial. Two years is the maximum penalty for the crime of being an accessory after the fact.

Both Dias and Brown threw themselves at the mercy of the court yesterday morning, accepting responsibility for their respective roles in the crime.

Dias pleaded not guilty to the charge of murder but admitted instead to the lesser count of manslaughter, accepting that he had unlawfully killed Manikam on April 2nd, 2016.

For his part, Brown admitted that he, knowing that Dias, Nalinie Manikam and another person had murdered Roger, did on that day and thereafter, receive, relieve, comfort and assisted them.

Nalinie is the daughter of the deceased.

Presenting the prosecution’s case, state attorney Mandel Moore said that the now dead Manikam was lured into the kitchen of his 237 Section B Nonpareil house by Dias, Nalinie’s reputed husband, who also lived at the address.

The court heard that there, Dias unleashed blows on the man, hitting him to the head with an axe. Although the man fell, he thereafter continued inflicting more blows.

The prosecutor said that sometime after Dias called his friend Brown to the scene and they both placed Manikam’s body in Brown’s car and drove to the Coldingen Embankment Road, where they dumped the body.

The cause of death, Moore said, was given as severe haemorrhaging, resulting from blunt trauma to the head.

In a plea of mitigation, attorney Latchmie Rahamat, who represented Dias, sought to impress upon the court that while her client takes full responsibility for his actions, there were certain existing circumstances which precipitated the drastic actions he took on the fateful day.

After fully disclosing to the court the circumstances, including the physical abuse of Nalinie, Rahamat, citing case law, begged the court to be merciful to the young first-time offender.

She asked the court to also consider that the 22-year-old had pleaded guilty at the first given opportunity, saving the court considerable time in otherwise having to conduct a trial.

Noting that her client was only 21 years old when the offence was committed, counsel stressed that her client, who turns 23 later this month, not only took responsibility for his actions but has also expressed remorse for those actions.

She said he realises that his actions resulted in loss of life.

Counsel also described her client as being a model prisoner, while noting that he is very active in Bible studies behind bars.

Given a chance to address the court, Dias, in a tearful voice, said that he was sorry, while noting that it was only because of the circumstances to which his attorney had earlier alluded, that he did what he did.

“Please have mercy on me,” he quietly begged the judge.

Meanwhile, presenting his plea in mitigation on behalf of Brown, whom he represented, attorney Dexter Todd said that the father of two, who was 24 years old at the time, had no antecedents.

The lawyer said his client related receiving a call from Dias on the night of the killing requesting a vehicle jumpstart and thereafter proceeded to his friend’s home.

Upon arrival, Todd said that Brown was told certain things, but had at that time been unaware of the killing. He stressed that all his client had been told was that “there was an incident.”

Thereafter, counsel said that Brown, because of his ignorance of the law, proceeded to assist his friend, under the misconception that because he had not been present during the killing, he would not be held responsible for nothing.

Todd said that it was only after his arrest that Brown realized his error and the fact that he should have made a police report.

Noting that his client has had time to think about his actions, Todd pleaded with the court for mercy, advancing that if there is a person fit to return to society, it would be Brown.

Addressing Brown, Justice Kissoon said that statute provides for a maximum of years, but since he had already spent that behind bars, with remission he would be free to go.

The visibly-relieved Brown, moments before his handcuffs were released, expressed his gratitude to the court.

For Dias, however, the judge commenced sentencing at a base of 30 years, explaining that the statute so stipulates for guilty pleas to manslaughter. From that he deducted eight years for the youth’s early plea.

Another five years were deducted for his lawyer’s plea in mitigation and an additional one year was subtracted for the remorse expressed by Dias.

From the remaining 16 years, the court granted remission for the two years he has been incarcerated.

While noting that the court was moved by his attorney’s plea in mitigation, the judge made it clear to Dias that his actions had to be viewed in the context of a civilised society, while adding, “Your conduct cannot be justified.”

Manikam, 65, was discovered near a drain, some five corners from his house, along the Coldingen Embankment Road. There was a chop wound to the back of his head.

Django

Ogle woman, 70, gets 18 months for shooting at hotel worker.

April 10 2018

Source

A year after being charged with shooting at a hotel employee, 70-year-old Leila Jagdeo was yesterday sentenced to 18 months in jail after being found guilty of the crime.

Jagdeo, of Lot 3 Ogle, East Coast Demerara, was found guilty of discharging a loaded firearm at Brandon Collins on March 30th, 2017.

 After being charged in April last year, Jagdeo was released on $100,000 bail pending the outcome of her trial before Magistrate Alisha George at the Sparendaam Magistrate’s Court.

Collins, a maintenance worker of the Alpha Hotel at Ogle, was clearing vines from the hotel’s fence when he was asked to leave, by Jagdeo, the owner of the house next door.

 After he ignored her, the then, 69-year-old woman, who was a licensed holder, armed herself and discharged a round at Collins, which struck him in the abdomen.

A hotel staffer had claimed that Collins had turned his back to remove himself from the fence when the woman shot him.

“He had been trimming the trees that was over the fence. He had finished the front and was working at the back and the woman was standing on her verandah. She turned and tell him to come off the fence before she shoot him,” the employee, who asked not to be named, had related to this newspaper.

Collins, of Manchester, Corentyne, Berbice, was admitted at the Georgetown Public Hospital for some time after the shooting.

Django

Mom gets 98 years in jail for killing children

Hofosawa Awena Rutherford was yesterday afternoon sentenced to a total of 98 years in jail for killing her two children, Hodaciea Cadogan and Jabari Cadogan Jnr, whom she poisoned in 2014.

Justice Navindra Singh, who sentenced Rutherford on two counts of man-slaughter for the killing of four-year-old daughter Hodaciea and one-year-old son Jabari Jr, said he could not understand why the woman was not indicted for murder, while noting that he found the killings to have been premeditated.

“Everything points to murder,” the judge opined.

Referencing the evidence presented at trial, Justice Singh said he could not fathom how Rutherford could possibly have mistaken the rat poison that she administered to her children for anything else.

Hodaciea Cadogan

Her claim had been that as far as she knew she had bought and given to them “cold tablets.”

The judge remarked that the poison, in the form of carbon tablets, carries a pungent odour, which would have become evident from the moment its packaging was opened.

He said the fumigation scent would not be missed as such tablets do just that, “fumigate.”

Meanwhile, in her brief address to the court, a tearful Rutherford begged Justice Singh for mercy, declaring that she has her imperfections and has made her fair share of mistakes.

“I am not perfect. I have my shortcomings and made my mistakes in this life,” the woman said, as she turned towards her many relatives seated in the public gallery to whom she apologised for having caused shame and pain.

“I am sorry for all the shame and pain I caused to you,” she told members of her family, who at that point were also moved to tears.

Jabari Cadogan

A sobbing and barely audible Rutherford, who professed her love for her children, said that no one in the world could have loved them more than she did, while adding she prayed their souls rest in peace.

While the woman begged for mercy, however, State Prosecutor Abigail Gibbs asked the judge to impose the maximum penalty, while highlighting the manner in which the children’s lives were taken from them.

There were sighs of distress from the woman’s family when Gibbs made the call for the maximum penalty.

In an impassioned address, Gibbs said that Rutherford knew exactly what she was doing.

“Their lives were taken by their own mother,” the prosecutor lamented, before adding that the woman’s role was to love and care for them, but that she had instead failed them both in this regard.

Addressing defence attorney Adrian Thompson’s earlier submission of his client having had “a hard life and financial challenges growing up,” Gibbs emphasised that such circumstances do not justify killing, “especially your own children.”

For his part, Thompson, who begged for mercy on his client’s behalf, said that having reviewed the probation report done on her, he gleaned that “the circumstances of her upbringing were not ideal.”

He said that the young woman dropped out of school at age 16 after becoming pregnant, and that she had also lost her mother at a tender age.

In spite of these challenges, however, Thompson said that Rutherford forged ahead and had been in the process of seeking employment with the Guyana Police Force.

According to counsel, the woman had not only been beset by financial difficulties but she had also not been in the best of health “mentally.”

The lawyer declared that “stress can cause people to do things which they would not have ordinarily done,” noting that the woman was still grieving and therefore he pressed the judge to use his discretion in sentencing.

After expressing his bewilderment over the charge of manslaughter being instituted instead of the capital charge, the judge took the position that Rutherford knew what she was doing.

From her address to the court, however, Justice Singh added that it seemed the woman had finally accepted what she had done.

Emphasising that he had found evidence of premeditation, the judge commenced sentencing on each count at a base of 30 years. He then added 10 years because the victims were children, five years because they were the convict’s children and another five years for the use of poison.

Thereafter, he added an additional 10 years for what he found was a premeditated act.

Therefrom, he subtracted eight years from the first count for the probation report and another seven years from both sentences for Rutherford’s expression of remorse.

On the first count, the woman was sentenced to 45 years and on the second count to 53 years.

The judge ordered that both sentences be served consecutively, with remission of some four years for time Rutherford would have so far spent awaiting trial on each count.

Many in the courtroom, which was almost packed to capacity, cringed after the sentence was delivered.

Rutherford was convicted by a jury on March 15th but her sentencing had been deferred to yesterday to facilitate the probation report. That report was laid over to the court by Probation and Social Services Officer Jo-Ann Samuels-Grant.

It was not read to the Court.

Rutherford had collapsed subsequent to the jury foreman announcing the verdicts.

It was the state’s case that the young woman deliberately administered rat poison to her children.

The two children died on March 27th, 2014, moments after Rutherford administered carbon tablets—a pesticide commonly used for killing rats—to them. Her claim was that she thought that she had given them cold medication. Rutherford was herself hospitalised for some time after drinking the tablets also.

Prosecutor Tiffini Lyken, who led the state’s case had asked the jury to consider the pungent odour that carbon tablets carry and the unlikeliness of those being confused with any sort of cold tablets.

She had asked the jury to rubbish Rutherford’s claims of ever purchasing cold tablets for the children as no evidence supported the assertion that they were even suffering from colds at the time.

According to a caution statement police said Rutherford gave, she claimed she purchased cold tablets from a man who also sold rat poison and “other stuff” on the road at the Plaisance Market.

Referencing the caution statement in which Rutherford told police about having problems and being frustrated while awaiting word on her application for a job as a traffic warden with the Guyana Police Force, the prosecutor stressed that it was because of this frustration that Rutherford killed the children.

In her address to the court at the close of the prosecution’s case against her, Rutherford, in unsworn testimony, had stated that she never gave her children carbon tablets, but rather administered to them what she believed to be “cold tablets.” “I did not buy rat poison for my children,” she declared.

The state’s case was represented by Lyken and Gibbs, in association with Prosecutor Shawnette Austin.

Django

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×