Skip to main content

October 31,2016

Source

Friday’s sitting of the National Assembly will hear a motion in the name of PPP/C MP Irfaan Ali calling for an immediate forensic audit into the Georgetown City Council including the controversial parking meter project.

Debate on the motion could prove interesting as the Alliance for Change (AFC), the junior partner in the governing coalition, has signalled that its position on the matter will be decided by the Deputy Mayor, Sherod Duncan, who has said he is against the parking meters contract.

Irfaan Ali
Irfaan Ali

The contract has been championed at the city council by A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) members including the current Mayor, Patricia Chase-Green.

The recital to Ali’s motion noted that the Mayor and Town Clerk had entered into a contractual arrangement with Smart City Solutions (SCS) for the installation of parking meters but that there had been no consultation with the citizenry by the Mayor and City Council. SCS had held a number of consultations with various stakeholders but these were not well attended.

Ali’s motion further noted that citizens who drive into and traverse the capital have called for an abandonment of the project because of the “financial hardships” it threatens.

The motion also adverted to two reviews of the contract by the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Legal Affairs which said among other things that municipal tender procedures were violated, the contract was heavily in favour of SCS and the cost was burdensome.

Ali noted that the company has been proceeding full speed ahead with its plan “with aggressive promotion, importation of equipment and the hiring of staff”.

He said this has been occurring even though there are legal hurdles and outstanding questions including whether the Mayor and City Council has authority over public roads like Regent Street, Water Street and Avenue of the Republic where parking meters are to be established.

Ali also noted the AFC’s and Duncan’s opposition to the project and in the resolve clause of the motion asks that the National Assembly “calls on the Auditor General of Guyana to immediately conduct a forensic audit into the Georgetown Municipal Council including the Parking Meter Contract”.

Controversy has raged around the contract for months because of the secrecy surrounding it, likely cost to users and concerns that procurement rules have been breached.

Earlier this month, after a majority of city councillors voted to approve amendments to the contract between the city and National Parking Systems/ SCS, City Hall signed the updated agreement for the introduction of parking meters that would see a lower toll, among other things.

At a council statutory meeting on September 26, 2016, a motion was moved by Councillor Oscar Clarke for the amendments of the controversial parking meter contract to be adopted and included in the contract, which was first signed on May 13, 2016.

The amendments, which were presented to the full council on August 31, include the reduction of the parking tariff to $50 per 15 minutes from the originally proposed “up to $125” per 15-minute interval, as well as the reduction of the length of the contract to 20 years from 49 years.

Seventeen of the 21 councillors present voted in favour of the motion, while the two People’s Progressive Party (PPP) Councillors, Khame Sharma and Bishram Kuppen, voted against and councillor Andrea Marks along with Deputy Mayor Sherod Duncan abstained.

Duncan, who has been very public in his opposition to the manner in which the contract was awarded, told Stabroek News that while the amendments were passed using a democratic process he respects, he could not support them because they were part of a contract that didn’t follow the legally required process.

He reminded that reviews of the contract by the Ministry of Finance and the Attorney General also found “many additional faults” but noted that he is pleased that the rejection of the original contract led to the citizens of Georgetown getting “much, much more than the contract offered from the inception.”

The contract between NPS/SCS and the administration of the city of Georgetown has been the source of several controversies since its signing, with a primary concern being the fact that the city never engaged in public tendering for the project, thereby contravening municipal procurement laws.

Following the widespread public concern generated by this oversight, government ordered that a review be done to ascertain if there were any irregularities.

Two reviews were done on the deal: one by the Ministry of Finance and the other by the Attorney-General’s Chambers. The Ministry of Finance’s review severely criticised the deal, saying that government procurement rules may have been transgressed, while the AG’s review also pointed out that the terms highly favour the contractor.

The reviews, however, did not find the contract to be illegal and the central government recommended only that the city renegotiate the contract after seeking the advice of an accountant.

Following the council’s decision, Town Clerk Royston King was charged with signing and operationalising the amended contract on behalf of the council.

Meanwhile, the contractor NPS/SCS, under the direction of the Managing Director of Business Development Amir Oren, has launched a vigorous public relations campaign to inform the public about the terms of the contract as well as the scope of the service to be provided. Oren has replaced Ifa Cush as the face of the company’s operations.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Nehru posted:

MOTION DENIED!!!!!!!!!! THE GADAHAS WANT TO ROAM FREELY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No audits!! If they do then there will be no chance to thief. They don't need audits so they can set up phantom companies and collect the money on the side..just like the phantom payrolls at city hall. Dem ah juss be proactive bhai.

FM

Interesting that the PPP, which screams against audits when they are being investigated doesn't think its a "waste of money" when its the new government to be investigated.

I would think that an audit would be due after 23 years of incompetence and theft as we see a millionaire class of PPP officials who cannot account for this, given their poverty in 1992.

FM
caribny posted:

Interesting that the PPP, which screams against audits when they are being investigated doesn't think its a "waste of money" when its the new government to be investigated.

I would think that an audit would be due after 23 years of incompetence and theft as we see a millionaire class of PPP officials who cannot account for this, given their poverty in 1992.

Do you remember how may audits were conducted from 1964 to 1991? Did anyone dare say audit without fear of being vaporized?

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×