Skip to main content

FM
Former Member
A mentally retarded African-American prisoner has been put to death by lethal injection in the US state of Texas despite a ban on the execution of inmates with mental disabilities.



Marvin Wilson, 54, was executed Tuesday evening after the US Supreme Court rejected arguments that he was too mentally impaired, and, therefore, must not be subjected to the death penalty.

Wilson's attorneys had argued that he should have been ineligible for capital punishment because of his low IQ.

Before the lethal injection was administered, Wilson told his three sisters and son several times that he loved them and asked that they give his mother "a big hug."

Press TV has conducted an interview with Randy Short with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference in Washington. What follows is an approximate transcript of the interview.

Press TV: Just point out a couple of points, in 2004, a psychological test showed Marvin Wilson with an IQ of 61 and the acceptance rate of 70. However, still the Supreme Court denied this fact and lethal injection was brought on to this man. Why is that?

Short: Well, he is black and poor. There are plenty of people who deliberately murder large numbers of people who are often white and they do not execute them. So often times, how you look and how much money you have determines whether you will get executed within the US judiciary.

Press TV: Funny the way you mentioned the way you look and how much money you have, he was convicted of killing a police informant. Now would this have something to do with it? Is the US trying to make a point not to bring shame to the police department?

Short: No, think about the gentleman who is on trial in Arizona who was shot up, nearly killed Congresswoman [Gabrielle] Giffords and all those, and he is not facing the death penalty and he said had killed all those folks.

You have the case of Jeffery Dahmer, the while cannibal, who ate about 18 people and they did not execute him.

The people who tend to be killed by the state tend to be people of color and poor white, and a preference for killing African-American males. It is either judicial or ex-judicial; it’s the same way. Most of the people who are killed by the police in this country are black and male.


It is America. You have to remember this, African-American people, if you look at the Constitution, Article one, Section two, paragraph three, is classified as three-fifths human. We’re subhuman by law in this society. We are amended citizens. The Constitution has to be changed for us to be even considered as people.

The United States has a caste system, no different from that of India and African-Americans, in particular. Others happen to be the β€œuntouchable”. So the laws are more harshly applied to people that are not seen as equals or worthy or good humans.


Think about it this way, the Nazis learned everything that they did in Europe on the Jews from the United States, as did the South Africans and other repressive parts of society.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Quote "It is America. You have to remember this, African-American people, if you look at the Constitution, Article one, Section two, paragraph three, is classified as three-fifths human. We’re subhuman by law in this society. We are amended citizens. The Constitution has to be changed for us to be even considered as people." Unquote

FM

You have Mullah TV in their usual role of slanted journalism. The man mentioned above had a trial. It is clear that he was of low IQ and had it not been Texas, he would not have been killed. In any event, it was not an extrajudicial "killing" but cruel and unusual for Texas to do it.

 

We are in a federal republic. The there are more death penalty states than not. It is a rare thing these days to have someone put to death. Even on death row, individuals can live out their lives. Dhamer was convicted and sentenced to multiple life sentences in a non death penalty state. Mulllah TV is presenting sloppy and slanted news for the consumption of haters like you.

 

In the US there are no black men killed extra-judicially, at least knowingly. Indeed the Police are disproportionately arresting and charging black kids with crimes and indeed they may be more quick on the trigger and sometimes they kill them on the slightest pretext but it is not a judicial practice. When it is known to be the case Federal charges are brought against the police if local officials fail their task.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

You have Mullah TV in their usual role of slanted journalism. The man mentioned above had a trial. It is clear that he was of low IQ and had it not been Texas, he would not have been killed. In any event, it was not an extrajudicial "killing" but cruel and unusual for Texas to do it.

 

We are in a federal republic. The there are more death penalty states than not. It is a rare thing these days to have someone put to death. Even on death row, individuals can live out their lives. Dhamer was convicted and sentenced to multiple life sentences in a non death penalty state. Mulllah TV is presenting sloppy and slanted news for the consumption of haters like you.

 

In the US there are no black men killed extra-judicially, at least knowingly. Indeed the Police are disproportionately arresting and charging black kids with crimes and indeed they may be more quick on the trigger and sometimes they kill them on the slightest pretext but it is not a judicial practice. When it is known to be the case Federal charges are brought against the police if local officials fail their task.

You exercise double standards, when it comes to Guyana, if a Black man stump his toes you cry racism by Indians.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

What double standard? The US does not hire drug lords to kill citizens.

The US will hire who they need to get the job done.

 Do not prattle nonsense. Give me one instance where a federal or state internal security agency had a murder for hire scheme put in place by the governor or president.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

What double standard? The US does not hire drug lords to kill citizens.

The US will hire who they need to get the job done.

 Do not prattle nonsense. Give me one instance where a federal or state internal security agency had a murder for hire scheme put in place by the governor or president.

The US get the gangs to have a go at each other, then they make a big hue and cry, then move in for mop-up claiming "victory" and someone get a big career boost.  Just shut up you foolish old man.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

What double standard? The US does not hire drug lords to kill citizens.

The US will hire who they need to get the job done.

 Do not prattle nonsense. Give me one instance where a federal or state internal security agency had a murder for hire scheme put in place by the governor or president.

The US get the gangs to have a go at each other, then they make a big hue and cry, then move in for mop-up claiming "victory" and someone get a big career boost.  Just shut up you foolish old man.

The US does no such thing. There is no policy in place anywhere that let gangs have a free for all against each other.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

 Do not prattle nonsense. Give me one instance where a federal or state internal security agency had a murder for hire scheme put in place by the governor or president.

The US get the gangs to have a go at each other, then they make a big hue and cry, then move in for mop-up claiming "victory" and someone get a big career boost.  Just shut up you foolish old man.

The US does no such thing. There is no policy in place anywhere that let gangs have a free for all against each other.

As I said, foolish old man.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

 Do not prattle nonsense. Give me one instance where a federal or state internal security agency had a murder for hire scheme put in place by the governor or president.

The US get the gangs to have a go at each other, then they make a big hue and cry, then move in for mop-up claiming "victory" and someone get a big career boost.  Just shut up you foolish old man.

The US does no such thing. There is no policy in place anywhere that let gangs have a free for all against each other.

As I said, foolish old man.

I am 52 so if that is old to you then my regrets. It can only be that at your age you have sat long and hard on your ass  ass and do nothing to enhance  your youthful longevity.

 

Again, there is no official policy in place in the US to murder citizens. Indeed justice can be sloppy but even sloppy security forces do not farm out  murder for hire scheme  to target supposed criminals as  law enforcement strategy,

 

The Jagdeo government did. The numbers of how many they murdered range anywhere from 200 to 200 but even if it was one hundred it was a wicked and corrupt thing to do and makes any with the knowledge this was going on complicity with murder hence unfit for public office.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×