Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

 

 

 

 

 

Above is the sworn testimony of one of Sharma's victims. The supporters of the APNU/AFC on GNI will try to have this discussion censored by the moderator. Why? Cause it exposes the hypocrisy and duplicitous nature of the opposition politicians. On one hand they were very vocal in their calls for charges to be laid against then COP Henry Greene following allegations of rape by a woman the acting CJ found to be less than credible. There were protests, vigils outside Greene's home and loud condemnations and calls for his removal by their extension organizations Red Thread and the GHRA. 

 

However one of their own, the late Everall Franklin played a pivotal role in bringing to the attention of the authorities the plight of 5 underage girls who suffered brutally at the hands of one of their own, CN Sharma. And how did they respond? With complete silence which translates to support. The same lawyer who represented the legal interest of the woman who made the rape allegation against Greene(who was deemed to be acting against opposition interests) is providing legal representation to Sharma. Both Sharma and his lawyer, AFC Chairman Nigel Hughes are doing their utmost best to prevent justice from being served. This is the nature of the opposition. They have separate rules and moral benchmarks for themselves and separate ones for those deemed to be acting contrary to their interests.   

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Besides the question of how you came by the police notes the reality is the man is before the court. If he is then that is where he ought to be. The law will deal with him according to the evidence and if he is found guilty then he ought to spend a considerable time in jail for being a sexual deviant.

 

 

Why is Sharma important to you? Did we not live with almost two decades of instances where the law allowed rapists to get off because the perps can make private deals with the victim parents? I am sure you can find many instances of that in a casual search of Kaiteurnews and Stabroeknews archives and those are only the ones reported. If you were here back a few years you would note it was a point of continual consternation because the administration under the auspices of Priya failed to do their duty. It let sexual predators walk free.

 

 

You are not concerned with Sharma being a pervert. You are somehow trolling to plant blame. You do not come out of your hole to speak to issues. You come out to post slant on hope it demeans someone in the opposition. Who is your target this time still eludes me. If it is the lawyer defending Sharma then you are indeed in supreme bottom feeding mode. That is what lawyers do! It is their job!

 

 

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Besides the question of how you came by the police notes the reality is the man is before the court. If he is then that is where he ought to be. The law will deal with him according to the evidence and if he is found guilty then he ought to spend a considerable time in jail for being a sexual deviant.

 

 

Why is Sharma important to you? 

 

Sharma is a public figure, he is the head of a political party that forms part of the APNU and by extension the opposition. The very opposition was vociferous in its condemnation of Henry Green when allegations of rape were made against him. This same opposition is silent in Sharma's matter. The CJ ruled in Green's matter that there wasn't sufficient evidence to charge him given that his accuser was not credible yet this very opposition wanted his head even as they sat silent amidst the accusations by 5 underage girls against Sharma. Sharma's party hold a seat in parliament.   

FM

As I understand it, the unauthorized disclosure or publication of prosecution material that is yet subject to legal scrutiny in court would make such material inadmissible in court. So in one fell swoop albert has single handedly denied the alleged victim justice. I wonder if that in itself is a criminal offence for which albert can go to prison for.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by albert:

D2/Stormborn you have proven yourself once again with your defense of another dastardly act by an opposition member to be a shameless bum. You are the scum of the earth. I pray your relatives suffer worse than those 5 underage girls did at the hands of Sharma.   

Shut you corrupt backside. Where have I supported any of these dastardly acts?

 

I am making the point that you are not here on a moral grind with respect to the odium of sexual predation in our society.  It is pervasive and even many in your own party are clearly sexual predators. That presently sickly pandit is surely a corrupt pedophile. I believe that wholeheartedly

 

And Beri Beri did indeed try to rape his friend's 16 year old daughter? I do not know if Rohee kidnapped and raped the gentleman's wife because he refused to hack opposition computers as  Balwant represented before the Canadian authorities. But he was accused of it and the Canadian authorities believed the accusers.

 

There are many of the heinous nature presently in the news that you may use to highlight your moral angst  were it  a concern of yours. There is that little girl who was so gruesomely strangled and buried in the mud in the back dam last week by one who already was accused of sexual predation. You can speak to the lawyer representing that bastard as corrupt.

 

You are here in your usual sententious muck raking role as an agent of malice to paint someone bad. In this case it is the lawyers representing Mr Sharma. But if in your opinion they are to be blame for their  legal profession which is to  defend the accused;  what are you telling us? Do you think that the accused should be unrepresented? I would like to here of this new model of jurisprudence.

 

Do not pray that harm come to my relatives. I will make sure they avoid the corrupt PPP at all cost. I plan to do the same since I do no trust them either.

 

By the way who is D2?

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Mr.T:

As I understand it, the unauthorized disclosure or publication of prosecution material that is yet subject to legal scrutiny in court would make such material inadmissible in court. So in one fell swoop albert has single handedly denied the alleged victim justice. I wonder if that in itself is a criminal offence for which albert can go to prison for.

....as albert rubs his hands together with glee.

cain
Originally Posted by warrior:

fat albert i see you already convict sharma,any body that think the government is doing some thing wrong is committing a crime.well sharma still have to get his day in court,but kwame already been found guilty what will the ppp do about that 

It's a badge of honour for people in the closed circle of the PPP. Kwame will get a pay raise.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by Mr.T:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

The Allegations against Sharma are indeed very  serious

The disclosure of prosecution evidence is even more serious and can lead to a mistrial.

Perhaps, the opposition should question the DPP, the AG, MHA and the Commish on this breach of confidential info and ask for the prosecution of this paid PPP blogger Albert / Conscience at the least for public mischief.

Mitwah

Just as i predicted the shameless opposition defenders on GNI thronged this thread condemning everything else except the act perpetrated by one of their own. These opposition politicians can do no wrong in their eye sight. I long for the day when one of their relatives suffer at the hands of these very politicians they now stoutly defend.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×