Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Woman lies to get husband arrested, charged

September 18, 2014 | By | Filed Under News 

A woman, who lied to the police about being threatened by her husband leading to him being arrested and charged,

Charmaine Sookram

Charmaine Sookram

was ordered detained by city Magistrate, Ann McLennan yesterday.
After Charmaine Sookram’s husband was charged, she admitted that when she made the complaint at the police station last Saturday, she was confused but that he had not made any threats to her.

 

Her lies led to an innocent man being arrested, detained by police and brought before the courts. It was revealed that Sookram told officers that her husband threatened her with poison and a gun. It is unclear what she claimed that he intended to do with those items.

 

The Magistrate who heard Sookram’s tale said that the court would make her an example. McLennan emphasised that it is not right for any person to go to the police station and make false allegations just to get someone arrested and brought before the court.

 

The case against the man was dismissed. She emphasised that it is an offence punishable by law to make false allegations against someone.
β€œYou will be kept in the court lockups until the rising of the court,” the Magistrate ordered.

 

Sookram was then led to the police lockups where she remained until the end of the day. It is unclear whether a charge will be leveled against her.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Cobra:

The woman said she was confused. You hear that, Gilly? 

Cobs, saying something and meaning it are two different things. That woman's backside is in a pickle and she thinks she can get out of it by saying she was confused. She will always be "confused."

In case you're wondering why I'm harsh, it's because of my years of experience personally and observations of other similar experiences.

In my younger years I willingly forgave some girlfriends' wrongdoings, only to find myself at the receiving end of more eyepass later. I had to cut my losses and scram, with never a regret.

I've also witnessed how some men forgave their wives/girlfriends for worse than I experienced and live to regret it.

A man gotta do what he gotta do. Better to cut and run than stay and burn.

FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:

Gilly, some lessons that we learn are very expensive, but we live to guide others from making the same mistake. (only if they take the advise).

 

I have been telling Nehru about his sweet women, but he rass hard of hearing. Them women will send him straight to his  

Bhai, Me Sweethomen does treat me like a KING in every respect.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

It would be in Mr Sookram's best interest to file for a divorce. He should not wait to see what this woman would do next. Unless he's a sucker for more eyepass.

That is a quick option.

 

Another and perhaps better option is for him to assess the situation for there might be some issues which she has that can be adequately addressed in time. In that way, the marriage/union can progress in a harmonious manner.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

It would be in Mr Sookram's best interest to file for a divorce. He should not wait to see what this woman would do next. Unless he's a sucker for more eyepass.

That is a quick option.

 

Another and perhaps better option is for him to assess the situation for there might be some issues which she has that can be adequately addressed in time. In that way, the marriage/union can progress in a harmonious manner.

You have a point, D_G. One must consider all options based on individual circumstances.

FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

It would be in Mr Sookram's best interest to file for a divorce. He should not wait to see what this woman would do next. Unless he's a sucker for more eyepass.

That is a quick option.

 

Another and perhaps better option is for him to assess the situation for there might be some issues which she has that can be adequately addressed in time. In that way, the marriage/union can progress in a harmonious manner.

You have a point, D_G. One must consider all options based on individual circumstances.

We all will have views/opinions on a matter.

 

However, it is the two individuals who, collectively, know all of the issues to simultaneously move along a path for a resolution.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×