The preparation of Whim's rally was bigger than the expectation of the rally itself. I am still looking for Indian supporters that supported Moses in 2011. All I can see is mass turn out of Afro-Guyanese. I never knew Whim and it neighboring villages were predominantly Afro. I am looking for Indians like looking for a needle in a haystack. 
Am I the only crazy person on GNI?
trust me you are crazy in fact your are stupid crazy
to go over to Knews and magnify the front page that carries the mass turnout at APNU/AFC rally yesterday and count how many Indian you can see.
Please come back here and let us know if Moses pass the ultimate test.
No one has to do that dumb ass. They simply have to use the jacobs method and they can do that with any photo editing software with the ability for setting precise grids.
Jacobi method or Jacob's method
Given a square system of n linear equations:
where:
Then A can be decomposed into a diagonal component D, and the remainder R:
The solution is then obtained iteratively via
The element-based formula is thus:
</dd></dl>
The computation of xi(k+1) requires each element in x(k) except itself. Unlike the GaussâSeidel method, we can't overwrite xi(k) with xi(k+1), as that value will be needed by the rest of the computation. The minimum amount of storage is two vectors of size n.
Choose an initial guess 
to the solution 
while convergence not reached do
for i := 1 step until n do
for j := 1 step until n do
if j â i then
end if
check if convergence is reached
(while convergence condition not reached)</dd></dl>
Source used to provide the exact forms of the equations.
And, for your information Mr. Stormborn, this is just one of the numerous mathematical and statistical items which I use in my profession work.
I think dem pictures giving DG Nara.
He also got Goadie.
Goadie -- announcing to all what you have.
Folks, If Moses can't get 11% Indian votes, the game is over. Do the maths.
Non Indians are now at least 52% of the voters. Many Indians are angry with the PPP and even the Peeping Tom, a known PPP supporter says so.
So how can the PPP win when its is peddling itself as a "coolie party".
What is the PPP doing to make Afro Guyanese feel more involved in the governance of Guyana. Appointing a PM whose only will be to distribute toys to orphans? 95% of blacks will continue to reject the Indo KKK party, as will many Amerindians, based on the reception that Granger is getting.
.. All I can see is mass turn out of Indoo-Guyanese. I never knew Georgetown didn't have ANY black people
PPP busted with a bunch of Rose Hall cane cutters pretending to be G/town black people.
to go over to Knews and magnify the front page that carries the mass turnout at APNU/AFC rally yesterday and count how many Indian you can see.
Please come back here and let us know if Moses pass the ultimate test.
No one has to do that dumb ass. They simply have to use the jacobs method and they can do that with any photo editing software with the ability for setting precise grids.
Jacobi method or Jacob's method
Given a square system of n linear equations:
where:
Then A can be decomposed into a diagonal component D, and the remainder R:
The solution is then obtained iteratively via
The element-based formula is thus:
</dd></dl>
The computation of xi(k+1) requires each element in x(k) except itself. Unlike the GaussâSeidel method, we can't overwrite xi(k) with xi(k+1), as that value will be needed by the rest of the computation. The minimum amount of storage is two vectors of size n.
Choose an initial guess to the solution
while convergence not reached do
for i := 1 step until n do
for j := 1 step until n do
if j â i then
end if
check if convergence is reached
(while convergence condition not reached)</dd></dl>
Source used to provide the exact forms of the equations.
And, for your information Mr. Stormborn, this is just one of the numerous mathematical and statistical items which I use in my profession work.
Why should I care? Did I ask you that or informed Cobra how a reasonable number of crowd density can be arrived?
Folks, If Moses can't get 11% Indian votes, the game is over. Do the maths.
Non Indians are now at least 52% of the voters. Many Indians are angry with the PPP and even the Peeping Tom, a known PPP supporter says so.
So how can the PPP win when its is peddling itself as a "coolie party".
What is the PPP doing to make Afro Guyanese feel more involved in the governance of Guyana. Appointing a PM whose only will be to distribute toys to orphans? 95% of blacks will continue to reject the Indo KKK party, as will many Amerindians, based on the reception that Granger is getting.
These are the numbers purported to be the leaked census number being hidden by the PPP
At 2012
Total
population 747,884
Afros 223,224 29.8%
Amerindians 78,683 10.5%
Indos 298,279 39.9%
Mixed 141,166 18.9%
Others 6,532 0.9% 5123 chinese imported from China
These numbers, if they are right, spells out the reason the PPP is afraid.
INDIANS | 298,279 | 39.00% |
AFROS | 223,224 | 29.80% |
MIXED | 141,166 | 18.90% |
AMERINDIANS | 78,683 | 10.50% |
OTHER | 6,532 | 0.90% |
| 747,884 |
|
Looking at the numbers PPP will have a hard time winning
this election.
INDIANS | 298,279 | 39.00% |
AFROS | 223,224 | 29.80% |
MIXED | 141,166 | 18.90% |
AMERINDIANS | 78,683 | 10.50% |
OTHER | 6,532 | 0.90% |
| 747,884 |
|
Looking at the numbers PPP will have a hard time winning
this election.
I am told these numbers are real. It spells disaster for the PPP. They will try to suppress votes. in specific areas. We need to watch region 8 especially. They can spend a few thousands US to suppress votes here and then add that to their total to steal this vital seat.
INDIANS | 298,279 | 39.00% |
AFROS | 223,224 | 29.80% |
MIXED | 141,166 | 18.90% |
AMERINDIANS | 78,683 | 10.50% |
OTHER | 6,532 | 0.90% |
| 747,884 |
|
Looking at the numbers PPP will have a hard time winning
this election.
Total population and voting age are separate and distinct numbers.
INDIANS | 298,279 | 39.00% |
AFROS | 223,224 | 29.80% |
MIXED | 141,166 | 18.90% |
AMERINDIANS | 78,683 | 10.50% |
OTHER | 6,532 | 0.90% |
| 747,884 |
|
Looking at the numbers PPP will have a hard time winning
this election.
Total population and voting age are separate and distinct numbers.
You are a statistician. Make the case why these proportions would not fall within the trend line of past elections, ie the voters list usually approximate the population percentages breakdown.
Folks, If Moses can't get 11% Indian votes, the game is over. Do the maths.
Non Indians are now at least 52% of the voters. Many Indians are angry with the PPP and even the Peeping Tom, a known PPP supporter says so.
So how can the PPP win when its is peddling itself as a "coolie party".
What is the PPP doing to make Afro Guyanese feel more involved in the governance of Guyana. Appointing a PM whose only will be to distribute toys to orphans? 95% of blacks will continue to reject the Indo KKK party, as will many Amerindians, based on the reception that Granger is getting.
These are the numbers purported to be the leaked census number being hidden by the PPP
At 2012
Total
population 747,884
Afros 223,224 29.8%
Amerindians 78,683 10.5%
Indos 298,279 39.9%
Mixed 141,166 18.9%
Others 6,532 0.9% 5123 chinese imported from China
These numbers, if they are right, spells out the reason the PPP is afraid.
Stoirmborn 40% of these people are under 18, so why do you use that as a source of the ethnic composition of the potential voting population.
INDIANS | 298,279 | 39.00% |
AFROS | 223,224 | 29.80% |
MIXED | 141,166 | 18.90% |
AMERINDIANS | 78,683 | 10.50% |
OTHER | 6,532 | 0.90% |
| 747,884 |
|
Looking at the numbers PPP will have a hard time winning
this election.
Total population and voting age are separate and distinct numbers.
You are a statistician. Make the case why these proportions would not fall within the trend line of past elections, ie the voters list usually approximate the population percentages breakdown.
Each election is separate and distinct.
While one can look at trends, the actual voting always take precedence over speculations.
Folks, If Moses can't get 11% Indian votes, the game is over. Do the maths.
Non Indians are now at least 52% of the voters. Many Indians are angry with the PPP and even the Peeping Tom, a known PPP supporter says so.
So how can the PPP win when its is peddling itself as a "coolie party".
What is the PPP doing to make Afro Guyanese feel more involved in the governance of Guyana. Appointing a PM whose only will be to distribute toys to orphans? 95% of blacks will continue to reject the Indo KKK party, as will many Amerindians, based on the reception that Granger is getting.
These are the numbers purported to be the leaked census number being hidden by the PPP
At 2012
Total
population 747,884
Afros 223,224 29.8%
Amerindians 78,683 10.5%
Indos 298,279 39.9%
Mixed 141,166 18.9%
Others 6,532 0.9% 5123 chinese imported from China
These numbers, if they are right, spells out the reason the PPP is afraid.
Stoirmborn 40% of these people are under 18, so why do you use that as a source of the ethnic composition of the potential voting population.
If 40 percent of them are under eighteen why did we get over 500K as eligible voters on the current rolls? In any event, had the previous case did not prove somebody is wrong, you or the elections board, the matter of the voter list matching population breakdown with minor deviations needs to be addressed.
INDIANS | 298,279 | 39.00% |
AFROS | 223,224 | 29.80% |
MIXED | 141,166 | 18.90% |
AMERINDIANS | 78,683 | 10.50% |
OTHER | 6,532 | 0.90% |
| 747,884 |
|
Looking at the numbers PPP will have a hard time winning
this election.
Total population and voting age are separate and distinct numbers.
You are a statistician. Make the case why these proportions would not fall within the trend line of past elections, ie the voters list usually approximate the population percentages breakdown.
Each election is separate and distinct.
While one can look at trends, the actual voting always take precedence over speculations.
Thank You Captain Obvious.
A pity you didn't know this when you speculated that the PPP would win 60% at the last elections.
If 40 percent of them are under eighteen why did we get over 500K as eligible voters on the current rolls?.
In 2002 45% of the population was under 18. When say 40% now I am being generous.
In addition, I am sure that you are aware that APNU AFC claim that the list is wrong and should be no more than around 420-450k.
In 1980 the mixed population was 85k, increasing to 88k in 1991. It was 141k in 2012, based on estimates. Mixed people migrate as much as do Africans and Indians so one cannot attribute that to lack of migration. So where did this massive increase in the mixed population come from? Obviously through increased miscegenation, meaning that a big chunk of these people are going to be under voting age.
Also you seem to forget that we had an election the year before this census. So how come the PPP won 49% if the voting age population is so overwhelmingly non Indian?
While one can look at trends, the actual voting always take precedence over speculations.
Thank You Captain Obvious.
A pity you didn't know this when you speculated that the PPP would win 60% at the last elections.
Everyone makes speculations. 
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
While one can look at trends, the actual voting always take precedence over speculations.
True and the actual trend shows fewer votes for the PPP in EVERY election since 1997. Is there any reason why this should suddenly change?
While one can look at trends, the actual voting always take precedence over speculations.
Thank You Captain Obvious.
A pity you didn't know this when you speculated that the PPP would win 60% at the last elections.
Everyone makes speculations.
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
60% is not my number.
That was yours dummy.
While one can look at trends, the actual voting always take precedence over speculations.
Thank You Captain Obvious.
A pity you didn't know this when you speculated that the PPP would win 60% at the last elections.
Everyone makes speculations.
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
60% is not my number.
That was yours dummy.
60% is/was never my prediction.
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
DG you were already busted screaming 60% a mere TWO months before the last election. You reduced it to 54% once you began to realize the stampede away from the PPP in Berbice. They got 49%.
While one can look at trends, the actual voting always take precedence over speculations.
Thank You Captain Obvious.
A pity you didn't know this when you speculated that the PPP would win 60% at the last elections.
Everyone makes speculations.
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
60% is not my number.
That was yours dummy.
60% is/was never my prediction.
Look at this bare faced liar.
At one time, you did predict the PPP would gain 60% of the votes in the last election. That thread was regurgitated several times.
Did you forget your ginko again?
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
DG you were already busted screaming 60% a mere TWO months before the last election. You reduced it to 54% once you began to realize the stampede away from the PPP in Berbice. They got 49%.
Simple matter Caribny ... I never made a speculation on 60%.
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
DG you were already busted screaming 60% a mere TWO months before the last election. You reduced it to 54% once you began to realize the stampede away from the PPP in Berbice. They got 49%.
Simple matter Caribny ... I never made a speculation on 60%.
Your simple matter is like your councie, very smelly.
You are a statistician. Make the case why these proportions would not fall within the trend line of past elections, ie the voters list usually approximate the population percentages breakdown.
We know that every one who was alive for the 1991 census is now voting age. Indians were 49%, Africans 32%, Mixed 12% with Amerindians and others accounting for the remainder.
So we can use that as a starting point and reduce the Indian population some what. But the numbers show that Indians still are by far the largest voting group. No one can win an election unless they split that vote, because the PPP will be able to buy some votes from non Indians.
Analyze the 2002 census and you will see that the 0-17 population is more than 40%. We don't have these numbers for the 2012 census, but I don't know that they will be radically different. Apparently massive numbers of people in the 25-40 range aren't living in Guyana.
Simple matter Caribny ... I never made a speculation on 60%.
We all know that you did, including you, but I do understand that this prediction deeply embarrasses you.
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
DG you were already busted screaming 60% a mere TWO months before the last election. You reduced it to 54% once you began to realize the stampede away from the PPP in Berbice. They got 49%.
Simple matter Caribny ... I never made a speculation on 60%.
nah, your prediction was greater than 60%
https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/gu...9#264469020632058229
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
DG you were already busted screaming 60% a mere TWO months before the last election. You reduced it to 54% once you began to realize the stampede away from the PPP in Berbice. They got 49%.
Simple matter Caribny ... I never made a speculation on 60%.
nah, your prediction was greater than 60%
https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/gu...9#264469020632058229
Those numbers were made in a jovial manner on the thread with Mara, at that time.
When election time came closer for presenting an estimate, I then made my prediction as 55%.
I did loose; and as was the wager made with a GNI member; where ever we meet I shall pay for the evening out for him and all of his guests.
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
DG you were already busted screaming 60% a mere TWO months before the last election. You reduced it to 54% once you began to realize the stampede away from the PPP in Berbice. They got 49%.
Simple matter Caribny ... I never made a speculation on 60%.
nah, your prediction was greater than 60%
https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/gu...9#264469020632058229
Those numbers were made in a jovial manner on the thread with Mara, at that time.
When election time came closer for presenting an estimate, I then made my prediction as 55%.
I did loose; and as was the wager made with a GNI member; where ever we meet I shall pay for the evening out for him and all of his guests.
Look dude, you were caught with your diapers off. Those numbers were ridiculed the day they were posted. That was your opinion then...mistaken I might add. Should I puff up my chest and remind you that I got it right?
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
DG you were already busted screaming 60% a mere TWO months before the last election. You reduced it to 54% once you began to realize the stampede away from the PPP in Berbice. They got 49%.
Simple matter Caribny ... I never made a speculation on 60%.
nah, your prediction was greater than 60%
https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/gu...9#264469020632058229
Those numbers were made in a jovial manner on the thread with Mara, at that time.
When election time came closer for presenting an estimate, I then made my prediction as 55%.
I did loose; and as was the wager made with a GNI member; where ever we meet I shall pay for the evening out for him and all of his guests.
Look dude, you were caught with your diapers off. Those numbers were ridiculed the day they were posted. That was your opinion then...mistaken I might add. Should I puff up my chest and remind you that I got it right?
Mr. Stormborn, understand issues as they are presented?
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
DG you were already busted screaming 60% a mere TWO months before the last election. You reduced it to 54% once you began to realize the stampede away from the PPP in Berbice. They got 49%.
Simple matter Caribny ... I never made a speculation on 60%.
nah, your prediction was greater than 60%
https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/gu...9#264469020632058229
Those numbers were made in a jovial manner on the thread with Mara, at that time.
When election time came closer for presenting an estimate, I then made my prediction as 55%.
I did loose; and as was the wager made with a GNI member; where ever we meet I shall pay for the evening out for him and all of his guests.
Spare me the bullshit about being jovial. It was a serious thread with elections predictions and you made yours which was off by miles.
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
DG you were already busted screaming 60% a mere TWO months before the last election. You reduced it to 54% once you began to realize the stampede away from the PPP in Berbice. They got 49%.
Simple matter Caribny ... I never made a speculation on 60%.
nah, your prediction was greater than 60%
https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/gu...9#264469020632058229
Those numbers were made in a jovial manner on the thread with Mara, at that time.
When election time came closer for presenting an estimate, I then made my prediction as 55%.
I did loose; and as was the wager made with a GNI member; where ever we meet I shall pay for the evening out for him and all of his guests.
Look dude, you were caught with your diapers off. Those numbers were ridiculed the day they were posted. That was your opinion then...mistaken I might add. Should I puff up my chest and remind you that I got it right?
Mr. Stormborn, understand issues as they are presented?
I am but a Padwain, Mr, Jedi sir, I do not claim to be so primed with the intricacies force that I know all the issues yet! I defer to you oh great Jedi Master...even the great Yoda would be in awe of your mastery of the force!
Those numbers were made in a jovial manner on the thread with Mara, at that time.
When election time came closer for presenting an estimate, I then made my prediction as 55%.
I did loose; and as was the wager made with a GNI member; where ever we meet I shall pay for the evening out for him and all of his guests.
I see. First you denied it. Now you claim it was "jovial". Even the 55% looked ridiculous. That was more than the PPP had ever won.
However, your number - 60% - is absolutely incorrect.
DG you were already busted screaming 60% a mere TWO months before the last election. You reduced it to 54% once you began to realize the stampede away from the PPP in Berbice. They got 49%.
Simple matter Caribny ... I never made a speculation on 60%.
nah, your prediction was greater than 60%
https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/gu...9#264469020632058229
Those numbers were made in a jovial manner on the thread with Mara, at that time.
When election time came closer for presenting an estimate, I then made my prediction as 55%.
I did loose; and as was the wager made with a GNI member; where ever we meet I shall pay for the evening out for him and all of his guests.
Look dude, you were caught with your diapers off. Those numbers were ridiculed the day they were posted. That was your opinion then...mistaken I might add. Should I puff up my chest and remind you that I got it right?
Mr. Stormborn, understand issues as they are presented?
I am but a Padwain, Mr, Jedi sir, I do not claim to be so primed with the intricacies force that I know all the issues yet! I defer to you oh great Jedi Master...even the great Yoda would be in awe of your mastery of the force!
The extremely scant ones evade you most of the time, Learned and Esteemed Stormborn.
to go over to Knews and magnify the front page that carries the mass turnout at APNU/AFC rally yesterday and count how many Indian you can see.
Please come back here and let us know if Moses pass the ultimate test.
No one has to do that dumb ass. They simply have to use the jacobs method and they can do that with any photo editing software with the ability for setting precise grids.
You canât use Herbert Jacobsâs method of crowd counting to estimate how many Indians were there with those camerasâĶ..you sound foolishâĶ.
You can use it to count how many are in a grid and assume equal distribution. You count the largest grid. It is best estimating. If I cannot know how the hell do you think your eye-balling does to to come up with conclusions work? You are a bloody dunce.
assume equal distribution <==> guess work, or "pulling objects from the air".
Tell em DG you doan pull your out of thin air you pull it out of ur (fill in da blanks) Ba..y H..e
Access to this requires a premium membership.
