Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Gilbakka:
Originally Posted by kp:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by kp:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

@kp, are you ready to concede that douglarization started shortly after 1838? Remember, in those days dem bai didn't have condoms and dem negresses didn't have the Pill, IUDs or other contraceptives.

 

Why is it that you think that bringing up this issue of "douglarization" in the context of the election campaign is anything more than an opportunity for Indo-bashing?

A little bit of knowledge is a good thing, but too much can put you over the hill. For Gill to stir-up such a subject at this time when there is obvious racial divide in Guyana 's political arena, Why,to appease the AFC followers to go with their leaders and join PNC, whom most are Indians. To reinforce a political party of racial blend is good , but to go as far back to when the first boat of Indians landed in British Guiana and to say the Black women were sleeping around with the Indian men, that's ashamed . You numbers may be correct of the ratio of men to women, but how can you conclude that the black and Indians were sleeping together. Can you apply the same formula to the every day military, navy etc, so those men fighting in Iraq etc for years at time would eventually become GAY??

According to your logics, men were sleeping with men..... hmmmmm.

That's according to Gil.

????

"the Coolies on Mr. GLADSTONE'S property, are a fine healthy body of men; they are beginning to marry or co-habit with the negresses,

In other words ,according to Gil, The Coolies were screwing the Blacks for a long time, Just keeping it political.

K
Originally Posted by kp:
 You numbers may be correct of the ratio of men to women, but how can you conclude that the black and Indians were sleeping together. Can you apply the same formula to the every day military, navy etc, so those men fighting in Iraq etc for years at time would eventually become GAY??

OK is it a conclusion that some prefer to hear that the first Indian indentures became gay, rather than mix with black women, only because of the dreaded "disease" called douglarization?

FM
Originally Posted by kp:
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:
Originally Posted by kp:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by kp:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

@kp, are you ready to concede that douglarization started shortly after 1838? Remember, in those days dem bai didn't have condoms and dem negresses didn't have the Pill, IUDs or other contraceptives.

 

Why is it that you think that bringing up this issue of "douglarization" in the context of the election campaign is anything more than an opportunity for Indo-bashing?

A little bit of knowledge is a good thing, but too much can put you over the hill. For Gill to stir-up such a subject at this time when there is obvious racial divide in Guyana 's political arena, Why,to appease the AFC followers to go with their leaders and join PNC, whom most are Indians. To reinforce a political party of racial blend is good , but to go as far back to when the first boat of Indians landed in British Guiana and to say the Black women were sleeping around with the Indian men, that's ashamed . You numbers may be correct of the ratio of men to women, but how can you conclude that the black and Indians were sleeping together. Can you apply the same formula to the every day military, navy etc, so those men fighting in Iraq etc for years at time would eventually become GAY??

According to your logics, men were sleeping with men..... hmmmmm.

That's according to Gil.

????

"the Coolies on Mr. GLADSTONE'S property, are a fine healthy body of men; they are beginning to marry or co-habit with the negresses,

In other words, according to Gil, The Coolies were screwing the Blacks for a long time, Just keeping it political.

cool . . . Herr KP, if that's what it takes to make u feel better about this whole thing, then by all means run with it

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by kp:
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:
Originally Posted by kp:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by kp:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

@kp, are you ready to concede that douglarization started shortly after 1838? Remember, in those days dem bai didn't have condoms and dem negresses didn't have the Pill, IUDs or other contraceptives.

 

Why is it that you think that bringing up this issue of "douglarization" in the context of the election campaign is anything more than an opportunity for Indo-bashing?

A little bit of knowledge is a good thing, but too much can put you over the hill. For Gill to stir-up such a subject at this time when there is obvious racial divide in Guyana 's political arena, Why,to appease the AFC followers to go with their leaders and join PNC, whom most are Indians. To reinforce a political party of racial blend is good , but to go as far back to when the first boat of Indians landed in British Guiana and to say the Black women were sleeping around with the Indian men, that's ashamed . You numbers may be correct of the ratio of men to women, but how can you conclude that the black and Indians were sleeping together. Can you apply the same formula to the every day military, navy etc, so those men fighting in Iraq etc for years at time would eventually become GAY??

According to your logics, men were sleeping with men..... hmmmmm.

That's according to Gil.

????

"the Coolies on Mr. GLADSTONE'S property, are a fine healthy body of men; they are beginning to marry or co-habit with the negresses,

In other words ,according to Gil, The Coolies were screwing the Blacks for a long time, Just keeping it political.

Sir, those people who came in on the Withby and Hesperus did not have a concept of themselves being "better than" having been at the footstool of their society for eons. Even Gladstone noted in his letter that he wanted them because they were in his words, simpletons. They would not have seen the freed slaves as worse than they are. They were the ones in bondage!

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×