Skip to main content

FM
Former Member
Recently there have been discussions, outrage and condemnation over the government’s mandate that Catholic religious employers include contraceptive coverage in their health insurance. It is noteworthy that including this coverage would increase the cost of insurance so there is a need to determine if it will be utilized enough to justify its cost. It is also believed that more than 90% of Catholic women use contraceptives. What is your position on this subject?

Here is mine. Realizing that including this coverage will increase the cost of insurance, it is also necessary to treat it no different than any other health issue. While the Catholic Church may see contraceptives as against their religious tenets, that obviously are not able to influence their women to refrain from using them. Therefore they should treat it as a health issue and not as a religious one. However, given the cost ramifications, they should ascertain how widespread it would be utilized if offered. They should employ an independent party to conduct a survey of only Catholic women to gauge its popularity and if it is as believed to be in the 90% range, they should offer it to their employees since their employees should not be discriminated against when it comes to health coverage.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Nuff:
It's election year and this topic has been blown out of proportion by the GOP to make it appear like an Obama assault on religion.

The fact is 98% of "fruitful" catholic women claim to use contraception and the other 2% are "untruthful".
what about the catholic preists that molest the little boys,what do they use
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Nuff:
It's election year and this topic has been blown out of proportion by the GOP to make it appear like an Obama assault on religion.

The fact is 98% of "fruitful" catholic women claim to use contraception and the other "fruitful" 2% are "untruthful".


This could be what is giving Santoran his bounce. Either his bounce is coming from Chrictian men alone or Christian women are being hypocritical. The law isn't mandating the use of contraception, it is only mandating its availability.
FM
Santorum "claims" he's not against contraception (I think he's lying) .... He basically is taking his battle to Obama by stating Obama is infringing on the church rights.

Personally I say ... the church pays no taxes it should stay out of gov't business. It shouldn't have a say in any laws. It's a tax free organization. When you pay taxes then you have a say in laws. yet still these peddlars like Billy Graham's son keep claiming Obama is not a christian. These are men of the cloth taking a political stance and gathering their sheep to vote misleading their followers. Go figure.

Anyway, Santorum is gaining mileage on the social and religious stance. He is capitalizing on the zealot christians (of which I am one .. Christian not zealot). If he sticks to the church and social values he is as far right as you can go, I mean the dude is ultra conservative and will take women back to the 19th century. Mitt has no chance competing with him for the extreme right because like I said Romeny is a moderate and he will lose followers if he tries to beat Santorum by going to the right.
FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×