Skip to main content

Originally Posted by HM_Redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Amazing. HM_Redux putting down Cheddie who was the leader of a country in two eras. Where is HM_Redux on the professional spectrum compared to Cheddie?

Way better off than any of you bottom crawlers who continue to blow cheddi because you are blind followers and can only understand and conform to group think.

 

So much better that you have time to post on a two cents message board at 8PM on a Saturday night.

 

Oh and regarding your nonsense about comprehension, I asked you to make a comparison between you and Cheddie. Instead, you made a comparison between you and us. Looks like you can use some comprehension lessons.

 

You would be better served if you read what you write at least 10 times before you hit the submit button. 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Wally:
Originally Posted by Mars:
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Burnham may have been a visionary but unfortunately he surrounded himself with incompetent people who drove the country into the ground. Time may have also played a role. Jagan may have been a stricter communist but time allowed him to make the necessary changes so when he came to power in 1992, the world had dramatically changed allowing him to adapt a friendlier economic module. Guyana was on a good rebound and that rebound continued even now. The trouble is that the leaders are more concerned with their own corrupted lives than where Guyana needs to go.

Time was not the reason that Cheddie abandoned communism and adapted a "friendlier economic module" (model). The IMF and The World Bank mandated an economic framework for the country to follow under Hoyte, namely the Economic Recovery Program (ERP). Cheddie was forced to continue with the ERP as a condition of him assuming the leadership.

Mars it look like you may just love for the white master  to return to bull whip you behind with his field horse whip.  While you are at it make sure you wash his feet before you bend down and kiss them.

Now! Really?

S
Originally Posted by seignet:
Originally Posted by Wally:
Originally Posted by Mars:
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Burnham may have been a visionary but unfortunately he surrounded himself with incompetent people who drove the country into the ground. Time may have also played a role. Jagan may have been a stricter communist but time allowed him to make the necessary changes so when he came to power in 1992, the world had dramatically changed allowing him to adapt a friendlier economic module. Guyana was on a good rebound and that rebound continued even now. The trouble is that the leaders are more concerned with their own corrupted lives than where Guyana needs to go.

Time was not the reason that Cheddie abandoned communism and adapted a "friendlier economic module" (model). The IMF and The World Bank mandated an economic framework for the country to follow under Hoyte, namely the Economic Recovery Program (ERP). Cheddie was forced to continue with the ERP as a condition of him assuming the leadership.

Mars it look like you may just love for the white master  to return to bull whip you behind with his field horse whip.  While you are at it make sure you wash his feet before you bend down and kiss them.

Now! Really?

Exactly. Not if Mars is who I think he is.

FM
Originally Posted by seignet:

Cheddie was never capable of having a plan for the economy. Had it not been for the ERP, Guyana would have been what it is today-only sooner.

Why wasn't he ever capable?

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by HM_Redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Amazing. HM_Redux putting down Cheddie who was the leader of a country in two eras. Where is HM_Redux on the professional spectrum compared to Cheddie?

Way better off than any of you bottom crawlers who continue to blow cheddi because you are blind followers and can only understand and conform to group think.

 

So much better that you have time to post on a two cents message board at 8PM on a Saturday night.

 

Oh and regarding your nonsense about comprehension, I asked you to make a comparison between you and Cheddie. Instead, you made a comparison between you and us. Looks like you can use some comprehension lessons.

 

You would be better served if you read what you write at least 10 times before you hit the submit button. 

You are a bigger dunce than I had originally thought and the more you open your traps the more we get a glimpse for what a dunce you really are.

 

Why should I compare myself to Cheddi? I am not a politician and I am not running for public office. I have never promised an entire nation anything and failed to deliver.

 

Jagan was a selfish failed politician which I and others have demonstrated time and time again. My career is not being a politician. 

 

You lack comprehension make no mistake about that, You are also asking me to compare myself to Jagan to deflect and detract from the issue at hand. No one is going anywhere to pujaree me they are going to idolize Janet Jagan and all her miseries the Jagans collectively have brought on the Guyanese people where the effects to this day are very clear.

 

Go and do some bloody reading you dunce.

FM
Originally Posted by JB:

Burnham vison and jagan vision. they was good friends.

How come with your thousands-of-dollars bottle of liquor and expensive yacht and hi-falutin trips and so on, you cannot string together a grammatically correct sentence now and then?

Kari
Originally Posted by HM_Redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by HM_Redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Amazing. HM_Redux putting down Cheddie who was the leader of a country in two eras. Where is HM_Redux on the professional spectrum compared to Cheddie?

Way better off than any of you bottom crawlers who continue to blow cheddi because you are blind followers and can only understand and conform to group think.

 

So much better that you have time to post on a two cents message board at 8PM on a Saturday night.

 

Oh and regarding your nonsense about comprehension, I asked you to make a comparison between you and Cheddie. Instead, you made a comparison between you and us. Looks like you can use some comprehension lessons.

 

You would be better served if you read what you write at least 10 times before you hit the submit button. 

You are a bigger dunce than I had originally thought and the more you open your traps the more we get a glimpse for what a dunce you really are.

 

Why should I compare myself to Cheddi? I am not a politician and I am not running for public office. I have never promised an entire nation anything and failed to deliver.

 

Jagan was a selfish failed politician which I and others have demonstrated time and time again. My career is not being a politician. 

 

You lack comprehension make no mistake about that, You are also asking me to compare myself to Jagan to deflect and detract from the issue at hand. No one is going anywhere to pujaree me they are going to idolize Janet Jagan and all her miseries the Jagans collectively have brought on the Guyanese people where the effects to this day are very clear.

 

Go and do some bloody reading you dunce.

Since you can't compare yourself to Cheddi, you should have kept your traps shut instead of calling him names. The many times you use the word dunce indicate that it is used very often to address you. Your postings leave no doubt about that. Cheddie's resume is public record. Where is yours? Now gwan suh.

FM
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by JB:

Burnham vison and jagan vision. they was good friends.

How come with your thousands-of-dollars bottle of liquor and expensive yacht and hi-falutin trips and so on, you cannot string together a grammatically correct sentence now and then?

Because she is wan comedian. She mamoo nah teach sheh hinglish

FM
 Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by JB:

Burnham vison and jagan vision. they was good friends.

How come with your thousands-of-dollars bottle of liquor and expensive yacht and hi-falutin trips and so on, you cannot string together a grammatically correct sentence now and then?

Kari it equates poor language with poor education, therefore uses such as part of the beard.

 

It views the world and values the world through a measure equated with education. It is important to note the PPP is also obsesses with this notion that is why they are all running to purchase Phd's from various Universities across the globe (The Intellectual). A good read of Harry L. Gracey may be enlightening for it. Surprised that it didn't cover this ground or maybe those readings were lost on it.

 

SMFH.......

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×