Skip to main content

Originally Posted by kp:
Originally Posted by Mars:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To the Indians , Moses is a traitor , he can only campaign in the Black neighbor hood. Look for action in Whim this weekend, the people will whip Moses.

That you presume to call him a traitor assumes the state is the domain of Indians. So is the PPP averse to black people and do they not belong in the state with equal right as any Indian? Actually, Moses knows Indians as blacks have equal right in the state and so he is a patriot to all peoples.

FM
Originally Posted by kp:
 

 

 

To the Indians , Moses is a traitor , he can only campaign in the Black neighbor hood. Look for action in Whim this weekend, the people will whip Moses.

The term "free and fair elections" means that political parties must have free and fair right to campaign anywhere within Guyana' borders, including Whim. Your statement points to possible PPP-orchestrated violence against Nagamootoo in Whim which, to you, is action. Most strange, seeing that you PPPites are the ones harping and carping about PNC elections violence.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by kp:
Originally Posted by Mars:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To the Indians , Moses is a traitor , he can only campaign in the Black neighbor hood. Look for action in Whim this weekend, the people will whip Moses.

That you presume to call him a traitor assumes the state is the domain of Indians. So is the PPP averse to black people and do they not belong in the state with equal right as any Indian? Actually, Moses knows Indians as blacks have equal right in the state and so he is a patriot to all peoples.

Would you still heap your praises on Moses if he was still with the PPP? 

Why was Moses not this vocal and spoke out against the evils of the PPP. Ya tink he bin friken he nah guh get wan paychek? Hmmmm!

 

FM
Originally Posted by Mars:
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

Mars, you're doing a great job posting these pics but you haven't named the location of some gatherings, the last set for example. Please do.

Tucville Youth Rally. It's a continuation of the set above it. 

 

Sorry if I wasn't more explicit.

Your pics show large attendance in mainly PNC strongholds, and decent turn out in the interior locations. 

 

What's happening in the PPP strongholds?  This is where the election will be decided.

FM
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:
.

PPP will pull a Netyanhu. It's all politics...be it fair or not. It's getting out your vote.

1.   PPP is terrifying Indians by playing the same racist game that Netanyahu did with Jews.

 

2.  Unlike Israel only 3 parties in Guyana win significant levels of votes, 2 of which are in coalition.  So the PPP will lose if they don't attract more than 50%.

FM
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Mars:
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

Mars, you're doing a great job posting these pics but you haven't named the location of some gatherings, the last set for example. Please do.

Tucville Youth Rally. It's a continuation of the set above it. 

 

Sorry if I wasn't more explicit.

Your pics show large attendance in mainly PNC strongholds, and decent turn out in the interior locations. 

 

What's happening in the PPP strongholds?  This is where the election will be decided.

We will get the answer tomorrow. They are heading to Berbice.

FM
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

Isn't it true that if there is a large black turnout and many Indians stay at home, the PPP will lose?

 

That might happen.

If this happens the AFC is in trouble, because there will be elements in the PNC which will question why the AFC gets 40% of cabinet if they didn't pull in at least 20% of the coalition votes.

FM
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

I think Granger is an honorable man who will keep his word.

 

Granger isn't the issue.  The issue is that if the AFC doesn't win at least 20% of the votes obtained by the coalition, and APNU MPs have to give up seats for AFC MPs, who didn't pull their weight in bringing in votes, there will be a feeling within APNU that the AFC got more than they deserve.

 

So it is up to the AFC to prove themselves by ensuring that at least 15-20% of the coalition votes come out of PPP strongholds.  They would have then earned their keep.

 

A coalition implies that BOTH entities pull their weight.  Not one pulling in the votes while the other just shows up to govern.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

I think Granger is an honorable man who will keep his word.

 

Granger isn't the issue.  The issue is that if the AFC doesn't win at least 20% of the votes obtained by the coalition, and APNU MPs have to give up seats for AFC MPs, who didn't pull their weight in bringing in votes, there will be a feeling within APNU that the AFC got more than they deserve.

 

So it is up to the AFC to prove themselves by ensuring that at least 15-20% of the coalition votes come out of PPP strongholds.  They would have then earned their keep.

 

A coalition implies that BOTH entities pull their weight.

 

 Not one pulling in the votes while the other just shows up to govern.

 

Isn't it Retarded to tell AFC & APNC that winning 51% of the Votes should not be their only focus and target on May 11th?

 

Even a Retard should agree ....they would have gone over in detail what they together can bring to the table on May11th ...before signing this alliance

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drooling

 

1999: All rights reserved. This site is designed for Internet ...

CaribJ the AFC-APNU Alliance has said all their Leadership & supporters are 100% Behind their approach to remove the Corrupt PPP from office.

 

They also say...they are a  few racist from the Outside..... who will raise all types of issues to breakup the alliance.....they expect them to keep Drooling and going over irrelevant Goat Shit Issues which the parties have already dealt with and moved on.

 

CARIBJ WHAT DO THEY MEAN

BY DROOLING?

 

 

J..... I will get the two spokesmen for the Parties...Mr Trotman & Mr Harmond answer your Concern that AFC & APNU are not happy with the agreement .....

and APNU is not happy  with AFC's Performance

in Indian Areas.....

 

AFC & APNU have Keep  focusing all their attention

on Removing PPP from the day they announced their agreement......

 

But CaribJ keep saying the Black people have Issues

with Nagamootoo, Ramjattan & AFC...

 

J needs some attention.

 

retarded

 

 

 

J what is the Difference between Drooling & Dribbling?

 

FM
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

I think Granger is an honorable man who will keep his word.

 

Granger isn't the issue.  The issue is that if the AFC doesn't win at least 20% of the votes obtained by the coalition, and APNU MPs have to give up seats for AFC MPs, who didn't pull their weight in bringing in votes, there will be a feeling within APNU that the AFC got more than they deserve.

 

So it is up to the AFC to prove themselves by ensuring that at least 15-20% of the coalition votes come out of PPP strongholds.  They would have then earned their keep.

 

A coalition implies that BOTH entities pull their weight.  Not one pulling in the votes while the other just shows up to govern.

Was the hilited in the deal?

cain

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×