Skip to main content

Reply to "The magic of Moses"

Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Kari:

"Moses cultists", Shaits is already a phrase with a losing connotation. what does it speak to? Irrelevance. Putting Moses and cultists adjacent ot each other is like saying "Intelligent Nehru" or "Smart Baseman".

 

Granger being the Presidential candidate is irrelevant. It is about two things: (i) possibility if Indian independence from the PPP); and (ii) Blacks and Coolies in one political coalition. Granger's screwing all the ideals of the coalition post-victory is not the point - even if you can show he will. But let's say blackman dominate the coalition, as seems to be angle of the use of Granger being the man that we all (Moses cultists) seem to miss. Does it really matter?

This very post defines what being a Moses cultist is all about.

 

Were Moses on his own without Granger there would also be no prospects of anything.

 

Why don't you credit Granger for being big enough to give up 40% of his cabinet and about as many of his MPs to allow this coalition to succeed?

 

Any post which says Moses, but doesn't say David, is a sign of Moses cultism.

Good point CaribJ.

TK, you must see the nuances of the political dynamics at play in this election. Granger and the APNU could give their 100% and more, were it not for a paradigmal shift in a coalition pushed for by Moses preceded by a minority government caused largely by Moses stamp on the AFC when it was a racially balanced party to become a 2nd Indian party mostly. Tht is not being a Moses cultist. That's just stating the reality. Take Moses away from 2011 and 2015 and we won't be having this conversation. Instead we'll be wailing.....5 more years?????

Kari
×
×
×
×
×
×