Take Granger out of the equation and Moses becomes a lot prophet. No commentary of this can be made without mention of Moses AND David.
You know if David told Moses no, then what would he be doing now?
Caribny we're looking at the 2015 Coalition following the Cummingsburg Accord. If Granger had spurned Moses' offer then we won't be having this conversation and I'd say the AFC will incrementally move up the political ladder to 15% to 20% of the votes in this cycle and position themselves fora peer relationship in 2012. I've said this many times here in this Forum.
What or who Granger and the APNU are is not what my conversation about Moses energizing THEIR base as well as making Indians comfortable with the notion of PNC. Why is the English language so difficult for you guys? Or is thsi a conversation where you have to make points? Should we take Moses out of our conversation and relegate him to an appendix and then laud the great General Granger?
Moses is NOT bringing in black votes. What he is doing is splitting the Indian vote, giving blacks the notion that the PPP could lose.
He could have also done that if he stayed outside of the coalition, as was the original plan. In fact didn't the AFC deny any plans for an alliance with APNU not that long ago?
What is apparent is that the AFC knew that it had as much need for the PNC as the PNC had for the AFC to split the Indian vote. The AFC initiated the approach, not the PNC. This signals that it is the AFC which feared the prospects on its future if the PPP won!
You will note that I said any conversation should be about David AND Moses.
Is the fact that I don't relegate David to genuflecting and kissing the "great" Moses's toe offensive to you?
The whole notion of the "Magic of Moses" is pure foolishness and in fact dangerous. If the coalition wins and anti Granger elements within the PNC suspect him to be some Trojan Horse he will be a marked man.
Your cultism isn't doing the man any favors.