Skip to main content

Reply to "Moses Nagamotoo top the list GNI discussion forum."

Originally Posted by Kari:
Caribny, your thinking (and I use the word liberally) is linear. Let's say Brian ara is good for 200 runs every innings, but there is no one who bats responsibly. He then does not achieve this potential. In comes Chanderapul and Lara's abilities get validated and he scores double centuries with consistency.

 

APNU (largely PNC) topped out at 40% and looks moribund, firs with Corbin and then a gentleman, yes, but uninspiring Granger. See if that young demographic will jump out of their couches to go vote, and if the old-timers will be bothered. Same ole, same ole they'll say....and nothing will change.

 

Along comes Moses Nagamootoo with leadership that challenges conventions, mine included, and say I will change the dynamics that your statistics show can't be changed. The AFC gets energized and the PNC voters take notice, and say, yes we can. Then again the last campaign that used "Yes, we can" as a theme only got vitriol from you.

 

So go wallow in your simplex analysis and talk about APNU 40% and PPP 49% and say the AFC can't be better than 11 and the coalition is charitable with 12, and that Granger leads the coalition, etc. thus diminishing Moses' galvanizing breath of life into an opposition that couldn't sniff Jagdeo's butt (pardon the phrase), let alone Ramotar's belly.

 

You're really hung up on static statistics, like Stormborn (who embellishes them sometimes and ascribes false weights). To borrow a phrase Caribny "that's why they play the game". It's not won on paper. The US upset Russia in 1980 in hickey. Villanova stunned Georgetown of the Ewing era. The '96 Yankees came back against the powerful Atlanta braves pitching, and on and on......

 

you should all underestimate Moses Nagamootoo at your own peril. The man has stunnjingly changed the 2015 election dynamic - no doubt about that.

very amusing . . . coming from the man who a-few-blinks-of-the-eye-ago poured pseudo-intellectual scorn on the coalition's chances, and saw no problem with [actually preferred!] giving the PPP five more years of plunder

 

smfh

FM
Last edited by Former Member
×
×
×
×
×
×