Drugb posted:antabanta posted:What??? As said before, the ombudsman conducted an objective investigation based on the evidence. Bear in mind, the managers of NBS were cleared of any wrongdoing long before the ombudsman got involved, long before the government changed hands. It seems that every accusation against the Rat is biased despite overwhelming evidence and common knowledge. But of course you are an objective observer.
Tell us the methodology of this investigation. Who were the investigators? Was it the police or foreign body? Who did they question and what evidence did they gather? Was it ratified in a court of law or some back office over two banks beer and cigarette? I am sorry for your loss in this matter, however I don't believe any of these folks are innocent, power of attorney fraud is too prevalent to let this one slide.
All those questions are answered in the report which you have no interest in. What loss? On what is your belief based? A grown man should not enter into a discussion and just spew words and phrases without substance just for emotional effect. From where did you come up with the idea of two banks and a cigarette? Is that how the Rat does things in Guyana?