Drugb posted:antabanta posted:Drugb posted:antabanta posted:You must be joking. There is ample evidence in the public domain. In addition, just ask any investor in Guyana to whom they had to pledge a cut before investing. You have to be wearing blinds to not be aware of the corruption of Jagdeo and the PPP.
As expected, you rush to use "common knowledge" as evidence. Do you really believe that these types of hearsay would stand up in a court of law? There is common knowledge floating around Guyana that Jagdeo is gay? Does this mean it is true? In legal matters one should stick to the law, good or bad. You can't have it both ways where perception is your evidence.
Common knowledge? Is that how you describe facts? Obviously, you have neither read the Ombudsman's report nor paid any attention to the NBS matter other than to rise up in defense of Jagdeo. Tune-in and come again.
Ombudsman report is not evidence, merely an opinion by a pnc operative for political purposes. I have read the media reports on the matter and have concluded that Arjoon and those who support him(hint hint) are guilty of covering up a power of attorney fraud.
You haven't read squat. Nevertheless, if the media reports are your source for determining guilt or innocence, what do you think of the reports of Jagdeo's crime syndicate? The general public has concluded that the Rat and those who support him (hint hint) are the biggest thieves Guyana has had the misfortune to produce.
The ombudsman's report is based on evidence. Not opinion. One of the directors of NBS stated clearly that Arjoon is innocent.
I hope everyone on this forum will remember your reverence for the media and not allow you to retract this sentiment.