so, which is it?
u sound confused and desperate
the only 'certainty' u have left is a calabash-full of red herring the guilty, cornered PPP gangsters paying u to fling out on this BB and probably elsewhere
ahmmmm . . . uh huh
Of course, those scenarios are additive to the probability that the PNC conveniently took him out as a trouble maker who may rally Indians to the PPP given his genocidal threats. It was a win win, silence the trouble-maker and blame the PPP as he was a genocidal racist critic of anything PPP and Indian. Kill two birds with one stone.
i again note your antiman justification for blowing out the brains of the only "genocidal racist" i ever heard of whose 'crimes' were:
(i) a lonely protest that the terror threatening, pimping (of an Indian woman) Attorney General was unfit for the job, and
(ii) armed with a bullhorn, exhorting the people to vote for a multi-racial coalition to end gangster rule by a murderous narco-government
the rest of your post is a piling on of confusion upon existing confusion for the simple reason(s) that you are mediocre and a stranger to logic . . . and, of course, you are being paid to spread race hate
uh huh . . .
Antiman, you confuse yourself between "justification" and the raising of possible "scenarios". You are one who likes to play judge, jury and executioner without facts. Whatever the facts are, let it be but until then we all could put up scenarios and pontificate.
As I said umteen times, regardless of anyone's feeling towards the banna, he deserved his right without harm. Any laws broken by him, that a matter for the judiciary. So don't go making up blatent lies of my position.