antabanta posted:y that at the time of the withdrawal, systems were not in place.
“The failures, gaps and omissions were therefore systematic and not to be attributed to the officer that sat at the pinnacle of the chain of command.” The Court therefore declared that the system ought to have been better enforced.To your expert knowledge does the recommendation of the court for better systems satisfy your requirements for the SOP? Please share with us the documentation of these global SOPs that you have been harping on. How did I become involved in the crime? Are you involved with Jagdeo's criminal enterprise? Have you not been visiting Guyana regularly during Jagdeo's reign?
Any financial institution in the world will not honor a power of attorney request to withdraw money without the said power of attorney being validated by the institution. Apparently you are a product of corrupt practices as you continue to hide behind technicality. You and I both know that if a man show up with a power of attorney at any bank and ask for a withdrawal of 350K, it would be prudent to question the validity of that power of attorney. In fact banks will require the account holder and grantee to be both present and sign the power of attorney in the presence of one of their loan officers who is a notary public. I believe Arjoon was involved with this fraud as he would be privy to the power of attorney document and who signed it and who certified it. Guyana is a small place with a limited amount of persons who can ratify power of attorney.
I have been once to Guyana under Jagdeo's rule. But it seems that you took your cut and run to the west to enjoy the ill gotten gains. Meanwhile karma is a bytch as we see Arjoon may not even be around to collect on this judgement.