caribny posted:ksazma posted:The PPP also acted like they can never lose another election but the difference is that they did not act like they were concerned about a fair election.
The 2015 election was held under a PPP administration. The result is that the PPP lost. The PPP has yet to accept the results of this election.
Do I have to reiterate the same thing to you on every thread. As much as you are hoping for a different answer it will not change if you ask it on another thread. The results should have been recounted according to proper protocol. If GECOM is supposed to be impartial, then there should be no expectation by the PPP that GECOM would either rig the election to benefit or hurt them. You continuously asking this question indicates that it is your expectation that GECOM is supposed to do that which benefits the government. Perhaps share your expectation explaining what he appointed an 84 years old PNC dinosaur to chair GECOM.